Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Ganga.M.Babu vs Director Of Public Institutions on 22 January, 2014

Author: P.R. Ramachandra Menon

Bench: P.R.Ramachandra Menon

       

  

  

 
 
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT:

       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

    WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014/2ND MAGHA, 1935

                  WP(C).No. 2157 of 2014 (T)
                  ---------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
-------------

       1. GANGA.M.BABU,
           D/O. M.BABU, STANDARD 9, GVHSS KALANJOOR,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
           (REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN SRI.MR.M.BABU).

       2. GAADHA M.BABU,
           D/O. M.BABU, STANDARD 9, GVHSS KALANJOOR,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
           (REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN SRI.MR.M.BABU).

       3. AMRUTHA M.,
           D/O. ANIL KUMAR D., STANDARD 9, GVHSS KALANJOOR
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
           (REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN SRI.MR.ANILKUMAR D.).

       4. ATHIRA S.,
           D/O. REMESHAN S., STANDARD 8, GVHSS KALANJOOR,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
           (REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN SRI.MR.REMESHAN S.).

       5. AYANA SANTHOSH,
           D/O. SANTHOSH, STANDARD 8, GVHSS KALANJOOR,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
           (REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN SRI.MR.SANTHOSH).

       6. SREELEKSHMI B.,
           D/O. BABURAJ K., STANDARD 9, GVHSS KALANJOOR,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
           (REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN SRI.MR.BABURAJ K.).

       7. SANDHYA S.,
           D/O. SASIKUMAR T., STANDARD 9, GVHSS KALANJOOR
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
           (REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN SRI.MR.SASIKUMAR T.).

       BY ADVS.SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR
               SMT.N.M.SHEENA DAS

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

       1. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
           JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

WP(C).No. 2157 of 2014 (T)




        2. THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE CONVENER,
           KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2013-14, PALAKKAD,
           OFFICE OF THE DDE, PALAKKAD-678 001.

        3. THE APPEAL COMMITTEE,
           DISTRICT YOUTH FESTIVAL/KALOLSAVAM 2013-14,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

        4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
           PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.


         BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE.


        THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
        ON  22-01-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
        FOLLOWING:




rvs/

WP(C).No. 2157 of 2014 (T)


                             APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
-----------------------

EXT. P1 :    COPY OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE CONSULTING DOCTOR.

EXT. P1(A): COPY OF THE MEDICAL BILL ISSUED BY THE HOSPITAL.

EXT. P2 :    COPY OF THE APPEAL PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS
             AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE APPEAL COMMITTEE IN THE
             APPEAL.

EXT. P3 :    COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM
             MANUAL.



RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------

           NIL.


                                             /true copy/



                                             P.A.TO JUDGE


rvs/



                P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
             ========================
                  W.P.(C). No. 2157 of 2014
             --------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2014

                           JUDGMENT

The petitioners participated in the event 'Group Dance' in the Pathanamthitta Revenue District School Kalotsavam for the year 2013-2014. As there was delay in starting the event and as two participants were affected by food poisoning they could not perform well. Thus they were awarded only 3nd place with A- grade. Aggrieved by the results, the petitioner preferred appeals before the Appeal Committee which was rejected as per Ext. P2 order dated 11.1.2014 and hence the writ petition.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well, who submits on instructions received that, there is absolutely no merit in the case projected by the petitioner. It is pointed out that, the marks were awarded adopting uniform pattern. The food served was consumed by thousands of persons and no instance of food poisoning was ever reported.

3. After hearing both the sides, this Court finds that, the defect if at all any, with reference to the time schedule was W.P.C. No. 2157 of 2014 -2- equally applicable to all the participants and hence this is not a fit case to call for interference of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Interference is declined and the writ petition is dismissed accordingly.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

kp/-