Chattisgarh High Court
Ramanand And Others vs Mst.Basin Palchin And Others 55 ... on 27 November, 2018
Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SECOND APPEAL No. 247 of 2003
1. (a) Ramanand, aged about 55 years, s/o Kirtan, R/o Village Salhe,
Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(b) Premsai, aged about 52 years, S/o Kirtan, R/o Village Salhe,
Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(c) Gajanand, aged about 50 years, S/o Kirtan, R/o Village Salhe,
Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(d) Bhuvaneshwar Prasad, aged about 45 years, S/o Kirtan, R/o
Village Salhe, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(e) Mst. Aghan Bai, aged about 48 years, D/o Kirtan, W/o Hiralal,
R/o Village Bataupali, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
----Appellants/ Defendants
Versus
1. (a) Mst. Basin Palhin, aged about 68 yeasrs, W/o Dauaram, R/o
Village Salhe, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(b) Feerat, aged about 50 years, S/o Dauaram, R/o Village Salhe,
Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(c) Santosh, aged about 44 years, S/o Dauaram, R/o Village
Salhe, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(d) Sankhu, aged about 42 years, S/o Dauaram, R/o Village Salhe,
Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(e) Chandram, aged about 40 years, S/o Dauaram, R/o Village
Salhe, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(f) Mst. Ganga Bai, aged about 48 years, D/o Dauaram, R/o Village
Nachanpali, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
(g) Mst. Bhartin, aged about 46 years, D/o Dauaram, R/o Village
Salhe, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
2. Chaitan, aged about 80 years, S/o Atmaram Satnami, R/o Village
Salhe, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
3. Sudesh, aged about 30 years, S/o Kolwa Satnami, R/o Village
Salhe, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
2
4. Dujeram, aged about 30 years, S/o Kolwa Satnami, R/o Village
Salhe, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
5. Mst. Noni Bai, aged about 65 years, Wd/o Kolwa Satnami, R/o
Village Salhe, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
6. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Raigarh (C.G.)
---- Respondents/Defendants
For Appellants : Mr. B.D. Guru, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 to 5 : None. For Respondent No.6/State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, PL.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 27/11/18
1. Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that at present he has no instructions in the matter and despite notice nobody has turned on behalf of appellants to make application for substitution.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the appellants.
3. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the appellants to proceed in accordance with law.
SD/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka