Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 441]

Madras High Court

G.Kirubhakaran vs The Deputy Superintendent Of Police on 2 July, 2019

Author: N.Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh

                                                             1

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 02.07.2019

                                                         CORAM:

                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                               CRL.O.P.No.15907 of 2019
                 1. G.Kirubhakaran
                 2. Govindan                                                                .. Petitioners
                                                        -vs-
                 1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                    Kancheepuram Town,
                    Kancheepuram District,

                 2. State Rep. by
                    Inspector of Police,
                    Baluchetty Chathiram Police Station,
                    Kancheepuram District.                                               .. Respondents


                 Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure
                 Code, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in any manner.

                                       For Petitioners     : Mr. A.Saranraj
                                       For Respondents     : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                          ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in any manner.

2.Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.

http://www.judis.nic.in

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent 2 police submits that on the complaint given by the defacto complainant against the petitioners, petition enquiry is pending in C.No.71 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police.

4.The petitioners are directed to cooperate with the police for enquiry and at the time of conducting of the enquiry, the petitioners shall not be harassed by the police. The police cannot call the petitioners on a regular basis in the guise of enquiry without even registering an FIR and Supreme Court of India in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2013 (6) CTC 353 has enumerated the nature of cases where preliminary enquiry can be conducted and has also restricted the period, for which preliminary enquiry can be conducted.

During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, second respondent is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against the respondent proceeding to take action in accordance with law.

5.With the above directions, the Criminal Original Petition is closed.

02.07.2019 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ssr http://www.judis.nic.in 3 To

1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram Town, Kancheepuram District,

2. The Inspector of Police, Baluchetty Chathiram Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

http://www.judis.nic.in 4 N.ANAND VENKATESH,J.

ssr CRL.O.P.No.15907 of 2019 02.07.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in