Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Arvind Kumar vs Employees State Insurance Corporation ... on 21 December, 2011

      

  

  

 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH
	
OA No.4522 of 2011

New Delhi this the 21st day of December, 2011

Honble Dr. Dharam Paul Sharma, Member (J)

Arvind Kumar
S/o Shri Deep Narayan Mandal
Joint Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation,
Headquarters Office, New Delhi-110002.
	.... Applicant
( Applicant in person )

VERSUS

Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC)
(Through Director General)
Headquarters Office (HO), Panchdeep Bhawan,
C.I.G. Road, New Delhi-100002		    Respondent no.1

Sh. Md. Ataullah, then Section Officer (Account-III)
(Through Director General)
New Delhi-2. 	                                    Respondent no.2

Additional Commissioner/Director (Finance)
(Through Director General)
ESIC, HO, New Delhi-2. 	                    Respondent no.3

Shri R. Natarajan, then Joint Director (Administration)
(Through Director General)
ESIC, HO, New Delhi-2 	                    Respondent no.4

Commissioner (Personnel and Administration)
(Through Director General)
ESIC, HO, New Delhi-2. 	                    Respondent no.5

Deputy Director (Cash) & Drawing Disbursing Officer,
(Through Director General)
ESIC, HO, New Delhi-2. 	                    Respondent no.6

O R D E R (Oral)

The present Application is directed against the impugned order dated 19.11.2010 rejecting the claim of the applicant for TA/DA. The impugned order itself states that in case the applicant feels further aggrieved, he can represent to the Establishment Branch-I. Admittedly, the applicant has not represented as such.

2. When the applicant is confronted that he has approached this Tribunal without exhausting the remedy available to him, he seeks to withdraw this Application with a view to avail the departmental remedy for redressal of his grievances, in the first instance, whereupon he will take action in accordance with law.

3. The Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

(Dr. Dharam Paul Sharma) Member (J) /ravi/