Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Gajendrasinh Mahendrasinh Chavda vs State Of Gujarat on 4 February, 2015

Author: J.B.Pardiwala

Bench: J.B.Pardiwala

          R/CR.MA/20292/2014                                             ORDER




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 20292 of 2014

================================================================
          GAJENDRASINH MAHENDRASINH CHAVDA....Applicant(s)
                             Versus
                 STATE OF GUJARAT....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR RUSHABH R SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. SAHIL M SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KL PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
 
                                Date : 04/02/2015 
                                  ORAL ORDER

1. Since I am not inclined to exercise my discretion in favour  of the applicant, this application is not pressed.

Mr. Dave, the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the  applicant seeks permission to withdraw the same.  

2. The permission as prayed for is granted.  This application is  rejected as not pressed. 

3. At this stage, Mr. Dave points out that the chargesheet has  been   filed   against   the   two   persons   i.e.   the   applicant   herein   and   his  father.   The   father   has   already   been   released   on   bail.     The   applicant  herein is aged 23 years.  He submits that had an evil­eye on the mother  of the applicant and on account of such reason, the applicant lost his  cool on the date of the incident and inflicted injuries with the sword. 

Page 1 of 2

R/CR.MA/20292/2014 ORDER Be   that   as   it   may,   the   innocence   or   the   guilt   of   the  applicant­accused shall be determined by the trial Court on the basis of  the   evidence   that   may   be   led   by   the   prosecution   and   the   defence.  However, taking into consideration the fact that the incident is of the  month of August, 2014 and the applicant is a young boy of 23 years age,  the trial Court is directed to see that the charge is framed at the earliest  and the trial proceeds further and the same is disposed of finally on or  before 30.04.2015. Rule is discharged.

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.)  aruna Page 2 of 2