Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Dr. Pallabi Saikia vs The State Of Assam And 4 Ors on 5 January, 2024

                                                                Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010265972023




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/6887/2023

         DR. PALLABI SAIKIA
         WIFE OF ABHIJIT KAKOTY, RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. 4C, BLOCK-B, HARA-
         GAURI APARTMENT, OPPOSITE ELITE GAS AGENCY, TARAZAN, A.T.ROAD,
         DISTRICT- JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785001



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
         GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION,
         DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006, ASSAM

         2:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION
          KAHILIPARA
          GUWAHATI- 781019
         ASSAM

         3:THE DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE
          JHANJI HEMNATH SARMA COLLEGE P.O. JHANJI
          DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
          PIN- 785683
         ASSAM
          REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

         4:THE GOVERNING BODY OF JHANJI HEMNATH SARMA COLLEGE
          P.O. JHANJI
          DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
          PIN- 785683
         ASSAM
          REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT

         5:THE PRINCIPAL
                                                                               Page No.# 2/3

            JHANJI HEMNATH SARMA COLLEGE
            P.O. JHANJI
            DISTRCT- SIVASAGAR
            PIN- 785683
            ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU

                                 BEFORE
                HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

                                         ORDER

Date : 05.01.2024 In view of the earlier order passed by this Court, Mr. S. Das, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department, has produced the relevant records wherein consideration of the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Professor(Stage-II) in JHNS College, Jhanji, was considered.

We have perused the records. However, it is to be noted that the case of the petitioner for the said promotion was not considered favourably in view of the fact that she did not meet the API Score. The reason for not meeting the API Score by the petitioner is that she was on leave for a long period w.e.f. 17.01.2020 to 02.04.2021 on account of maternity leave as well as child care leave and this period was not reckoned for calculation of her API Score.

In view of the above, Mr. P. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner, has referred to the communication of the University Grants Commission, dated 05.09.2018(Annexure- 23 to the petition) wherein, the manner and method, the API Score is to be reckoned in case of a person proceeding on a maternity leave or child care leave, is provided.

Page No.# 3/3 Mr. K. Gogoi, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department, on the next date fixed, shall apprise this Court as to the manner and method in which the leave period more specifically the maternity leave and child care leave is to be reckoned for calculation of the API Score of a person proceeding on such leave.

As prayed for, list it again on 11th of January, 2024.

The records as produced by Mr. S. Das, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department, is returned herewith.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant