Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Ramesh Shantilal Vora & 2 vs Jasminbhai Maheshbhai Shah & 2 on 27 January, 2016

Author: J.B.Pardiwala

Bench: J.B.Pardiwala

                   R/CR.MA/1905/2016                                                    ORDER



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
         CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1905 of 2016
                                                      In
                     SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 286 of 2016
         ==========================================================
                               RAMESH SHANTILAL VORA & 2....Applicant(s)
                                                   Versus
                            JASMINBHAI MAHESHBHAI SHAH & 2....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR ASHISH M DAGLI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 - 3
         PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 2
         ==========================================================

                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

                                             Date : 27/01/2016
                                              ORAL ORDER

1. This is an application for being impleaded as a party respondents in the main matter i.e. Special Criminal Application No.286 of 2016. What is challenged before me is the legality and validity of the order passed by the District Magistrate refusing to accord sanction under Section 196 of the Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code.

2. I take notice of the fact that rightly or wrongly the District Magistrate did hear the applicants herein in the said proceedings.

3. In that view of the matter the presence of the applicants would be required. The application is allowed. The applicants are permitted to implead as party respondents. Cause title be amended accordingly. Mr. Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Sun Jan 31 00:59:41 IST 2016 R/CR.MA/1905/2016 ORDER Ashis M. Dagli, the learned advocate waives service of notice for the newly impleaded respondents.

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.) Manoj Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Sun Jan 31 00:59:41 IST 2016