Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Mohammed Ashraf vs The Additional District Magistrate on 25 November, 2008

Author: K.M.Joseph

Bench: K.M.Joseph

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34768 of 2008(L)


1. MOHAMMED ASHRAF
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
                       ...       Respondent

2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

3. LEELA, KARUPPATH VEEDU

4. THANKAMANI, KARUPPATH VEEDU

5. REENA, KARUPPATH VEEDU

6. GEETHA, KARUPPATH VEEDU

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SAJU.S.A

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :25/11/2008

 O R D E R
                                   K.M.JOSEPH, J.
                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                            WP.(C) No.34768 of 2008
                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                     Dated this the 25th day of November, 2008

                                      JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a party to the proceedings before the first respondent under Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act. He has filed Ext.P4. Complaint is that final orders will be passed without deciding this petition.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and the learned Government Pleader.

The writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P4 in accordance with law before taking a final decision in the matter, if final decision has not already been taken.

(K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb