Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

M/S Hero Motocorp Limited (Formerly ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise ... on 30 April, 2019

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Navin Sinha

                                                                                   CA Nos.1600-1605 of 2018

                                                            1




                                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                   Civil Appeal       Nos.1600-1605 of 2018


     M/S HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN
     AS HERO HONDA MOTORS LIMITED)                                                    Appellant(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,
     DEHRADUN                                                                         Respondent(s)



                                                          O R D E R

1. All the appeals pertain to the liability of the assessee to pay National Calamity Contingent Duty (for short ‘NCCD’). This issue was pending consideration before this Court when these appeals were filed and subsequently the legal position stands settled by the decision of this Court in Civil Appeal No.3239 of 2019 titled as Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Union of India decided on 27.03.2019 opining that the NCCD is in the nature Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by of excise duty and is, thus, entitled to the POOJA ARORA Date: 2019.05.06 17:35:52 IST benefit of the exemption notification. Reason:

CA Nos.1600-1605 of 2018 2
2. Learned counsel for the respondent-

Department did seek to contend that the appellant has given up this plea before the High Court but on reading of the order we cannot come to such a conclusion as all that has been stated is that at the relevant stage of time view of the High Court was against the assessee which has been specifically reversed in Bajaj Auto Limited case (supra).

3. In view of the aforesaid, all the appeals are liable to be allowed in terms of the Judgment in Bajaj Auto Limited’s case (supra). We order accordingly.

4. As per the interim order dated 19.03.2018 interim stay had been granted in respect of the penalty amount but the other amounts had to be deposited and are stated to have been so deposited.

5. That being the position, the amount paid to the Department would be refunded back within a maximum period of two months from the receipt of CA Nos.1600-1605 of 2018 3 copy of this order.

6. The appeals are accordingly allowed.

....................,J.

(SANJAY KISHAN KAUL) ....................,J.

(NAVIN SINHA) NEW DELHI APRIL 30, 2019 CA Nos.1600-1605 of 2018 4 ITEM NO.104 COURT NO.13 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Nos.1600-1605 of 2018 M/S HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HERO HONDA MOTORS LIMITED) Appellant(s) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, DEHRADUN Respondent(s) Date : 30-04-2019 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Appellant(s) Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Shrinivas Kotni, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv.
Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Sumit Wadhva, Adv.
Ms. Urvashi Kalra, Adv.
Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Rukmini Bobde, Adv.
Mrs. Chiranjeev Chauhan, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.



    (POOJA ARORA)                            (ANITA RANI AHUJA)
    COURT MASTER                                COURT MASTER
(Signed order is placed on the file)