Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mrhanumant Shankar Shinde vs Ministry Of Defence on 28 April, 2016

                                                  CENTRAL 
INFORMATION COMMISSION
                                                         Club 
Building (Near Post Office)
                                                     Old JNU 
Campus,New Delhi­110067
                    Tel:+91­11­26106140/26179548


                                                                   File 
                                                 No.CIC/RM/A/14/3709/DP
                                            Date of decision:28.04.2016

Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant 
: Hanumant Shankar Shinde
                                      Padwal Ali, Ghaisas appt
                                      Flat No.07,above Gokhale Hall,
                                      Chinchwad,Pune­411033

Respondent                                                          : 
CPIO,Joint  General Manager(P&A)
  
Ammunition  Factory
  
Khadki, Pune­411003
  
RTI application filed on                                      : 
02/07/2013
PIO replied on                                                      : 
30/08/2013
First appeal filed on                                            : 
23/11/2013
First appeal Authority order                             : 
24/12/2013
Second appeal dated                                          : 
30/01/2014

Information sought

:

Appellant wants to know that after passing away of Smt. Asha Hanumant  Shinde,  his  wife  (Ex  Ammunition  Factory  worker)  on  23.8.2007,  what  financial benefit was given to her nominees & whether family pension  was given to her nominee. He wants copies of all relevant orders. Grounds for Second Appeal: 
The CPIO has not provided the desired information.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
Appellant: Hanuman Shankar Shinde present through VC.
Respondent :  N.P. Naik, CPIO and Joint General Manager, Ammunition  Factory, Khadki through VC.
1
 Appellant mentioned at the time of making Second Appeal that he had  not   got   the   relevant   documents   from   the   department.     Now   he   has  received all the relevant documents and has no case to pursue.
Respondent mentioned that due to second marriage after death of his  wife,   certain   additional   documents   were   required   to   pay   the   Govt.  dues to the  nominee after death of the Govt.  employee.  They have  redressed the grievances of the appellant.
Decision :
As the appellant is satisfied with the response of CPIO, no further  action lies.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
           Sd/ (Divya Prakash Sinha) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy (Raghubir Singh) Dy. Registrar/Designated Officer 2