Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Kerala High Court

P.M.Sumesh vs State Of Kerala on 3 April, 2012

Author: C.T. Ravikumar

Bench: C.T.Ravikumar

       

  

  

 
 
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT:

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR

         THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2012/31ST JYAISHTA 1934

                    Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1252 of 2012 ()
                    -------------------------------
   (AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE  JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,
    KUNNAMKULAM IN M.P. NO.8198/2011 IN CC.759/2011 DATED 3.4.2012)

REVISION PETITIONER(S)/REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
-------------------------------------------------------------

         P.M.SUMESH, AGED 35 YEARS
         S/O. MADHAVAN, PANTHAKKAL HOUSE, THENGLLUR P.O.
         THRISSUR DIST.

         BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.)
                 SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS
                 SRI. V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR

COMPLAINANT(S)/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS/STATE :
---------------------------------------------

     1.  STATE OF KERALA
         REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,  HIGH COURT OF KERALA
         ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031.

     2.  SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
         PERAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DIST.
         PIN-680545.

         BY  PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

       THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON  21-06-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:



al.



                       C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
                ===========================
                    C RL. R.P. NO. 1252 of 2012
                ===========================
                Dated this the 21st day of June 2012

                              O R D E R

When this matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks for permission to the revision petitioner to withdraw this revision petition with liberty to raise all contentions available under law to be taken up in appropriate proceedings. Based on the said circumstances, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn making it clear that it will be open to the petitioner to raise such contentions in appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law.

Sd/-

C.T. RAVIKUMAR (JUDGE) /True Copy/ P.A. to Judge kvr/