Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 11]

Gujarat High Court

Commissioner-Central Excise & Customs ... vs Steelco Gujarat Limited....Opponents on 27 September, 2016

Author: S.R.Brahmbhatt

Bench: S.R.Brahmbhatt, A.Y. Kogje

                  O/TAXAP/331/2009                                                JUDGMENT




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                     TAX APPEAL NO. 331 of 2009



         FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:



         HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT


         and
         HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE

         ================================================================

         1     Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
               to see the judgment ?

         2     To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

         3     Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of
               the judgment ?

         4     Whether this case involves a substantial question of
               law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of
               India or any order made thereunder ?

         ================================================================
         COMMISSIONER-CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS VADODARA-II....Appellant
                                   Versus
                     STEELCO GUJARAT LIMITED....Opponents
         ================================================================
         Appearance:
         MS AVANI S MEHTA, ADVOCATE for the Appellant
         MR ANAND NAINAWATI, ADVOCATE for the Opponent No. 1
         ================================================================

             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
                    and
                    HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE

                                          Date : 27/09/2016


                                               Page 1 of 2

HC-NIC                                      Page 1 of 2      Created On Wed Sep 28 00:09:25 IST 2016
                    O/TAXAP/331/2009                                            JUDGMENT




                                      ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT) Learned counsel for the Revenue brings to the notice of the Court that tax effect involved in this appeal is below the minimum threshold limit provided under CBEC in Circular dated 17th December, 2015, which is also made applicable to pending appeals. He also draws attention of the Court to subsequent instruction dated 1st January, 2016 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs to the effect that the instructions mentioned in earlier circular i.e. 17th December, 2015 is also applicable to pending appeals. He therefore seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. Permission as sought for is granted. The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) (A.Y. KOGJE, J.) pallav Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Wed Sep 28 00:09:25 IST 2016