Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Pawan Kumar Verma vs State Of Haryana on 5 November, 2008

Author: Ajai Lamba

Bench: Ajai Lamba

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH



                   Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-22666 of 2008
                               Date of Decision: November 05, 2008


Pawan Kumar Verma
                                                         .....PETITIONER(S)

                                  VERSUS


State of Haryana
                                                       .....RESPONDENT(S)

                             .       .      .


CORAM:         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA


PRESENT: -     Mr. M.S. Jandiala,                Advocate,         for     the
               petitioner.

               Mr. Narender Sura, Assistant Advocate
               General,     Haryana,    assisted    by
               Mr. Parveen Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the
               complainant.


                              .      .      .

AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)

While issuing notice of motion, the following was noticed:-

"This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. praying for anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.138 dated 10.05.2008 under Sections 406/420/467/468/471/506/120-B IPC, P.S. Thanesar, District Kurukshetra.
Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from ASI Dharam Pal, contends that challan has been filed, however, in regard to other co- accused. The challan in regard to Pawan Kumar and Parshotam Dass has still not been filed as investigation qua them is not complete.
In view of the above, the petition is adjourned to 5.11.2008. The petitioner would join investigation on 6th, 7th and 8th October, 2008, each day at 10.00 A.M. It is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on interim anticipatory bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the following Crl. Misc. No. M-22666 of 2008 [2] conditions:-......"

Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Hukam Singh, Sub Inspector, has informed the Court that against some of the accused, challan had been filed. Against the petitioner, investigation was pending. The petitioner has now joined investigation and is not required for further investigation at this stage.

                    In      view       of   the    statement        of        learned

counsel     for     the        respondent-State,           the     petition          is

allowed.

                    Order        dated      1.10.2008       is     hereby           made

absolute and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions :-

"(i) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required;
(ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and
(iii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court."

This order shall enure till 10 days after the petitioner receives a notice of filing of final report u/s 173, Cr.P.C. within which period, the petitioner would be at liberty to apply for regular bail.


                                                                  (AJAI LAMBA)
November 05, 2008                                                    JUDGE
avin