Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 2]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Manish Verma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 May, 2015

                               Criminal Appeal No.1177/2013
08.05.2015:
                     Shri Manish Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant.
                     In   compliance   of   earlier   issued   production   warrant 
              applicant­ Manish Verma is produced by Shri Narbad Singh 
              Marskole,   Assistant   Sub   Inspector,   Police   Lines,   Balaghat 
              from   District   Jail  Balaghat.  His   presence   is   marked.   He   be 
              returned back with the same Escort for serving his remaining 
              part of jail sentence. 
                     Shri   Akhilendra   Singh,   Government   Advocate   for   the 
              respondent­State.

Also heard on I.A. No.9019/2015, which is the second  application   for   suspension   of   remaining   jail   sentence   and  grant of bail to appellant. Earlier  application for suspension  of   sentence   and   grant   of   bail   of   the   appellant   has   been  allowed by this Court but on account of non­appearance of  the appellant, on issuance of warrant of arrest the appellant  of arrested.

The appellant has been convicted under Sections 353  and 294,  IPC  and Section  3 (1) (x) of SC/ST (Prevention  of  Atrocities)   Act   and   sentenced   to   undergo   rigorous  imprisonment   for   2   years   &   fine   of   Rs.3,000/­,   rigorous  imprisonment  for  1 month & fine  of Rs.500/­  and rigorous  imprisonment   for   1   year   &   fine   of   Rs.2,000/­   respectively,  with default stipulations.

Learned   counsel   for   the   appellant   submits   that   the  appellant has been falsely implicated in the matter. Learned  counsel for the appellant submits that he appeared on each  and every dates but on 06.05.2014 he could not appeared as  he missed the date of appearance. The non­appearance of the  appellant is bona fide and not intentional as he was in jail in  another   case.   The   appellant   was   on   bail   during   trial   and  never   misused   the   liberty   granted   to   him.   There   is   no  likelihood of coming up of this appeal for final hearing in near  future. In view of the aforesaid, the appellant prays that the  remaining sentence of the appellant may be suspended and  he may be released on bail.

Learned Government Advocate for the respondent­State  vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of  the case and the nature of allegation, without going through  the   merits   of   this   application   is   allowed.   Execution   of  remaining   jail   sentence   of   the   appellant­   Manish   Verma  is  suspended.   He   is   directed   to   be   enlarged   on   bail   on  furnishing   a   personal   bond   in   the   sum   of  Rs.25,000/­  (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with a surety bond in  the   like   amount  to   the   satisfaction   of   trial   Court   for   his  appearance   before   the   CJM,   Balaghat   firstly   on  16th  December,   2015  and   on   such   other   dates   which   normally  shall not be less than the period of 8 months as may be fixed  by the said Court in this regard.

It   is   made   clear   that   the   sentence   of   fine   is   not  suspended. 

List this case for final hearing in due course. C.C. as per rules. 

      (Subhash Kakade)                   Judge                  taj.