Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

The Director Of Income Tax ... vs Star Cruise India Travel Services Pvt. ... on 11 December, 2025

Author: S. M. Modak

Bench: S. M. Modak

2025:BHC-OS:24482-DB                                                                25-ITXA-529-2012.DOC




                                                                                                      Shephali


                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                         INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 529 OF 2012


                       The Director Of Income Tax (International                             ...Appellant
                       Taxation) -I Mumbai
                             Versus
                       Star Cruise India Travel Services Pvt. Ltd.                        ...Respondent


                       Mr Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant-Revenue.
SHEPHALI
SANJAY                 Mr Akhilesh Deshmukh for the Respondent.
MORMARE
Digitally signed by
SHEPHALI
SANJAY
MORMARE                                              CORAM:         SUMAN SHYAM &
Date: 2025.12.12
11:16:18 +0530                                                      S. M. MODAK, JJ.
                                                     DATED:         11TH DECEMBER 2025
                       PC:-

1. Mr Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant, submits that the tax effect involved in the present Appeal is below Rs. 2 crores. Therefore, in view of the Circular No. 09/2024, dated 17th September, 2024, issued by Government of India, Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the Appeal.

2. Taking note of the above submission of Mr Suresh Kumar, the Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.

3. The formulated substantial question(s) of law is/are, however, kept open to be decided in an appropriate proceeding.

Page 1 of 2

th 11 December 2025 ::: Uploaded on - 12/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 12/12/2025 23:12:39 ::: 25-ITXA-529-2012.DOC

4. Refund of the Court fees, if applicable, be issued, in accordance with Rules, if an application is made by the Appellant on that behalf.

(S. M. MODAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { Page 2 of 2 th 11 December 2025 ::: Uploaded on - 12/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 12/12/2025 23:12:39 :::