Madhya Pradesh High Court
Dharmdas Yadav vs Smt. Kastoori Bai on 9 February, 2024
Author: Dwarka Dhish Bansal
Bench: Dwarka Dhish Bansal
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
ON THE 9 th OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 289 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
DHARMDAS YADAV S/O LATE SHRI BHOORELAL
YADAV R/O KHEDA ITARSI, TEHSIL ITARSI, DISTRICT
NARMADAPURAM (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(BY SHRI AVI SINGH - ADVOCATE )
AND
1. SMT. KASTOORI BAI W/O SHRI RADHELAL, AGED
ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/O KHEDA ITARSI, TEHSIL
ITARSI, DISTRICT NARMADAPURAM (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. SMT TARA BAI W/O LATE SHRI BHOORELAL
YADAV, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O MINGALA'S
HOUSE KHEDA ITARSI TEHSIL ITARSI DISTRICT
NARMADAPURAM (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. LATE SHRI DHANUSHRAM YADAV S/O LATE SHRI
BHOORELAL YADAV
A - SMT. SHOBHA W/O LATE SHRI
DHANUSHRAM YADAV, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF KHEDA ITARSI TEHSIL ITARSI
DISTRICT NARMADAPURAM (MADHYA
PRADESH)
B - CHETAN YADAV S/O LATE SHRI
DHANUSHRAM YADAV, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF KHEDA ITARSI TEHSIL ITARSI
DISTRICT NARMADAPURAM (MADHYA
PRADESH)
C - ABHAY YADAV S/O LATE SHRI DHANUSHRAM
YADAV, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, RESIDENT OF
KHEDA ITARSI TEHSIL ITARSI DISTRICT
NARMADAPURAM (MADHYA PRADESH)
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: NIDHI DAVE
Signing time: 2/12/2024
12:59:04 PM
2
D - DISHA YADAV D/O LATE SHRI DHANUSHRAM
YADAV, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDENT OF
KHEDA ITARSI TEHSIL ITARSI DISTRICT
NARMADAPURAM (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. SMT. BHAGWATI BAI W/O LATE SHRI BHAGWAN
DAS, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O KHEDA ITARSI,
TEHSIL ITARSI, DISTRICT NARMADAPURAM
(MADHYA PRADESH)
5. SHRI TRIVESH YADAV S/O LATE SHRI BHAGWAN
DAS AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/O KHEDA ITARSI
TEHSIL ITARSI DISTRICT NARMADAPURAM
(MADHYA PRADESH)
6. SMT. SUSHILA BAI W/O LATE SHRI GULABDAS
YADAV, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O NALA
MOHALLA ITARSI TEHSIL ITARSI DISTRICT
NARMADAPURAM (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(NONE FOR THE RESPONDENTS)
T h is application coming on for admission this day, t h e cou rt passed the
following:
ORDER
Heard on I.A.No.2547/2024, which is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
2. Registry has reported this MCC to be barred by 214 days.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application supported by an Affidavit, there is sufficient reason for condoning the delay. Accordingly I.A.No.2547/2024 is allowed. Delay in filing the MCC is hereby condoned.
4. Heard on the question of admission.
5. The present application has been filed for restoration of S.A. No.2265/2022, which was dismissed due to non compliance of common conditional order dated 12.4.2023.
6. Considering the averments made in the application, this Court finds that sufficient cause is shown for restoration of the Second Appeal.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: NIDHI DAVE Signing time: 2/12/2024 12:59:04 PM 37. Accordingly, MCC is allowed.
8. S.A. No.2265/2022 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- (Two thousand only) payable to the State Legal Services Authority, Jabalpur within a period of seven working days, failing which the order of dismissal of Second Appeal shall remain intact.
9. The payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- shall be a condition precedent for restoration of S.A.No.2265/2022.
10. A copy of this order be kept in the file of S.A. No.2265/2022.
11. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed off.
(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL) JUDGE nd Signature Not Verified Signed by: NIDHI DAVE Signing time: 2/12/2024 12:59:04 PM