Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Mahasemam Trust vs M/S.Kiara Microcredit Private Limited on 29 March, 2022

Author: S.Ananthi

Bench: S.Ananthi

                                                                            REV.APLC(MD)No.63 of 2022

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                     DATED: 29.03.2022

                                                          CORAM

                                         THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

                                         REV.APLC(MD)No.63 of 2022
                     M/s.Mahasemam Trust,
                     Represented by its Trustee,
                     Mr.Prabhu Vairavan Pragasam,
                     A-1, VIP Apartments,
                     Lake Area Main Road,
                     Uthangudi Post,
                     Madurai – 625 107.                   ... Petitioner/Petitioner

                                                             Vs.

                     M/s.Kiara Microcredit Private Limited,
                     Falt No.G-1, VIP Apartments,
                     Lake Area Main Road,
                     Melur Road, Uthangudi,
                     Madurai – 625 107.                               ...Respondent/Respondent

                     PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of Civil
                     Procedure Code, to review the order dated 28.02.2022 in C.R.P(MD)No.
                     1881 of 2021.


                                        For Petitioner    : Mr.K.Subramanian
                                                            for K.Hariharan

                                                          ORDER

The petitioner filed this Review Application to review the order dated 28.02.2022 in C.R.P(MD)No.1881 of 2021. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4 REV.APLC(MD)No.63 of 2022

2.The petitioner has filed a Civil Revision Petition to set aside the order in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in Arbitration Case No.9 of 2020. In I.A.No.1 of 2021, the Arbitrator has stated only the counsel for the respondent would state that he has no other question put forth CW.1. But in Civil Revision Petition, this Court observed that the Arbitrator has every right to interfere in the cross examination when irrelevant questions are asked to the process. If any irrelevant question are put in cross examination, the petitioner has every right to object the question then and there and also confirmed the order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2021. The order has to be read entirely and observation made in the Civil Revision Petition is that the Arbitrator has every right to interfere in the cross examination, when irrelevant question are put to the process. The said view is taken in paragraph No.46 of the Judgment reported in 2020 SCC Online Delhi 228, Sukhbir Sing Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation P.Ltd. Since there is no error apparent on the face of record and no ground is made out for reviewing the order, this Review Application is dismissed. No costs.

29.03.2022 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No vsd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4 REV.APLC(MD)No.63 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4 REV.APLC(MD)No.63 of 2022 S.ANANTHI, J.

vsd Order made in REV.APLC(MD)No.63 of 2022 Dated:

29.03.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4