Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Sujatha vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 July, 2016

Author: S.Abdul Nazeer

Bench: S Abdul Nazeer

                              1



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

        DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2016

                          BEFORE

       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S ABDUL NAZEER

       WRIT PETITION NO.33755 OF 2016 (KLR-RES)

Between:

Smt.Sujatha
W/o. Sri.T. Umesh
Age: 45 years
R/at Anepalya, Tumkur Road
NH4, Nagasandra Post
Bangalore - 560 073.
                                            ... Petitioner
(By Sri.B. Ravindra Prasad, Adv.)

And:

1.     The State of Karnataka
       Assistant Director of Land Records
       Sub-Division Office
       Bangalore North Taluk
       Bangalore - 562 157.

2.     Smt. Shanthamma
       D/o. Smt. Ramiaha
       Age: Major
       R/at No.43, 3rd Cross
       Mysore Road, Bangalore - 560 026.
                               2



3.   Sri.Rangadasappa
     S/o. Not known
     AgeL Major
     R/at No.37, 19th Cross
     1st 'A' block, Rajajinagar
     Bangalore - 560 010.

4.   Sri. Anand
     S/o. Late Venkateshappa
     Age: Major
     No.31, Anchapalya, Nagasandara Post
     Tumkur Road, Bangalore - 560 073.

5.   Smt. Lingamma
     W/o. Not known
     Age: Major
     R/at Chikkabidarakallu
     Anche Palya, Tumkur Road
     Bangalore - 560 073.

6.   Sri. Vittal Rao
     S./o. Not known
     Age: Major
     R/at No.155, 3rd Main Road
     Nrupatunga Road
     Bangalore - 560 076.

7    Project Manager
     National Highway Authority
     Nagasasndra Post, Tumkur Road
     Bangalore - 560 07..

8.   Smt. Munilakshamma
     W/o. Not known
                              3



      Age: Major
      R/at Chikkabidarakallu
      Anchepalya, Tumkur Road
      Bangalore - 560 073.

9.    Sri. Kumar
      S/o. Not known
      Age: Major
      C/o. V.K.Bar, Chikkabidarakallu
      Anchepalya, Tumkur Road
      Bangalore - 560 073

10.   Sri. Uday
      S/o. Not known
      Age Major
      C/o. V.K.Bar, Chikkabidarakallu
      Anchepalya, Tumkur Road
      Bangalore - 560 073

11.   Sri.Babu
      S/o. Sri. Venkapatta
      Age Major
      R/at Chikkabidarakallu
      Anchepalya, Tumkur Road
      Bangalore - 560 073.
                                           ... Respondents
(By Sri.T.L. Kiran Kumar, AGA for R1,
    Sri.M.Krishnappa, Adv., for R2,
    Notice to R3 & R5 is dispensed with v/o.dtd.29.7.16,
    R4, R6, R8 to R11 are served)

     This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of
the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned
                               4



order passed by the R1 dated 01.03.2016 vide Annex-F and
etc.

     This writ petition coming on for orders this day, the
Court made the following:

                          ORDER

I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. In a proceeding in BSN No.109/2015-16 pending before the ADLR, Bengaluru North Taluk, the petitioner made an application at Annexure-E for her impleadment as an additional respondent. Without considering the application, the ADLR has allowed the application filed by respondent No.2 for phoding the land in question. In the application for impleading at Annexure-E, the petitioner has stated that she is the absolute owner of the land and that her presence is necessary for effective adjudication of the dispute. It is evident that without considering the application of the petitioner, the order 5 impugned has been passed. I am of the view that the ADLR has to reconsider the matter.

3. Therefore, writ petition is allowed. The order at Annexure-F dated 01.03.2016 is hereby quashed. The application at Annexure-E filed by the petitioner for impleadment is allowed. Smt.Sharadamma, who has initiated proceedings before the ADLR, is directed to implead the applicant-petitioner as respondent No.10. The ADLR is directed to consider the rival contentions of the parties and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law. The parties are directed to appear before the ADLR-respondent No.1 on 26.8.2016 without any further notice from him. No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE SA