Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Shajohn Jonas vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2014

Author: P.R. Ramachandra Menon

Bench: P.R.Ramachandra Menon

       

  

  

 
 
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT:

       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

    FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014/27TH POUSHA, 1935

                  WP(C).No. 1845 of 2014 (E)
                  ---------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
--------------

       SHAJOHN JONAS,
       STUDENT OF STANDARD NO.IX,
       MALABAR CHRISTIAN COLLEGE HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,
       MCC CROSS ROAD , VELLAYIL,
       KOZHIKODE 673 001
       REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN
       SHERONE FRANK, AGED 45 YEARS S/O.LATE N.J.VICTOR,
       D-2 BUSHRA APARTMENTS,
       JAWAHAR NAGAR COLONY MAIN ROAD,
       ERANJIPALAM P.O CALICUT -673 006.

       BY ADV. SRI.C.S.ARUN SHANKAR

RESPONDENT(S):
---------------

       1. STATE OF KERALA,
           REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
           GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT,
           TRIVANDRUM PIN 695 001.

       2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
           KOZHIKODE REVENUE DISTRICT,
           KOZHIKODE 673 001.

       3. THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE,
           54TH STATE LEVEL SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM,
           REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL CONVENOR,
           PALAKKAD, PIN 686 001.


       BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE.

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
       ON  17-01-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
       FOLLOWING:




rvs/

WP(C).No. 1845 of 2014 (E)


                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
------------------------

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE     COPY  OF THE   CERTIFICATES  ISSUED TO  THE
           PETITIONER IN THE EVENTS OF BHARATA NATYAM,IN THE SUB
           DISTRICT LEVEL SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2013-14.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE   COPIES  OF THE   CERTIFICATES  ISSUED TO  THE
           PETITIONER IN THE EVENTS OF FOLK DANCE, IN THE SUB
           DISTRICT  LEVEL SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2013-14.

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE.

EXHIBIT P4 A   TRUE  COPY  OF  THE  ORDER  PASSED   BY THE   2ND
           RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5 A   TRUE  COPY  OF  THE  RELEVANT   EXTRACTS OF   THE
           KALOTSAVAM MANUAL.


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------

           NIL.


                                           /true copy/



                                           P.A.TO JUDGE


rvs/



                    P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
              ..............................................................................
                         W.P.(C)No.1845 OF 2014
               .........................................................................
                      Dated this the 17th January, 2014

                                     J U D G M E N T

The petitioner was a participant of the event

-Bharatanatyam and Folk dance in the Kozhikode Revenue District School Kalolsavam 2013-14. When the result was published, the petitioner was disqualified, aggrieved of which, though the petitioner filed appeal, the same did not turned to be fruitful, as borne by Ext.P4 order. Hence this writ petition.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner points out with reference to Ext.P3 medical certificate that the petitioner had suffered an injury on the shoulder on 03.11.2013 and that because of injury, the petitioner was wearing Bandage, and it was properly concealed. Though she performed well, it was not properly evaluated. Hence the challenge.

4. Admittedly, the petitioner was suffering from an injury and the petitioner was advised to take leave for two months from 03.11.2013. In any view of the matter, the challenge , stated as raised was with reference to some technical problems. What W.P.(C)No.1845 OF 2014 2 was the technical problem is not discernible and no copy of the appeal memorandum is produced. It is seen that the grounds raised in the appeal were considered by the Appeal Committee and it was after considering all the relevant aspects, that Ext.P4 verdict was passed. This Court finds that no tenable ground has been raised in the writ petition to call for interference. The writ petition is dismissed.

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE lk