Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Vasant Barapatre vs Ministry Of Civil Aviation on 20 May, 2010

                     Central Information Commission
               Room No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office
            Old J.N.U. Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                           Tel No: 26161997
                                                   Case No. CIC/SS/A/2009/000094

     Name of Appellant           :     Sh. Vasant Barapatre
                                             (The Appellant was not present)
     Name of Respondent                :     Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Uran Akademi
                                       (Respondent was not present)

     The matter was heard on     :     5.05.2010



                                     ORDER

Sh.   Vasant   Barapartre,   the   Appellant,   vide   RTI  application   dated   22.06.2009   sought   the   copies   of   his   ACR  from  the Respondent  Public Authority.   Sh.  Shailesh  Jadhav  the   PIO   vide   letter   dated   21.07.2009,   denied   the   desired  information,   on   the   grounds   that   no   public   interest   was  involved   in   the   disclosure   of   the   ACRs.   Aggrieved   by   the  decision   of   the   PIO,   the   Appellant   filed   before   the   First  Appellate Authority (FAA). Air Marshal V. K. Verma, Director  and FAA, vide order dated 20.08.2009, upheld the decision of  the CPIO. Hence, the present appeal before the Commission.  [ Inspite of getting notice of the Commission, nobody is  present for hearing.   Hence, the Commission has decided to  dispose off the case on merit in absence of parties.  

On perusal of the relevant documents the Commission is  not inclined to accept the replies of the Respondent.   The  object   of   the   RTI   Act   is   to   promote   transparency   and  accountability   in   the   working   of   the   Public   Authority   and  keeping   in   view   peculiar   facts   and   circumstances   of   the  present   case,   the   Commission   is   of   the   opinion   that   the  disclosure   of   the   desired   information   would   promote  transparency in the administration of the Respondent Public  Authority. Moreover, in case number CIC/WB/A/2007/00422 dated  20.04.2007, the  Full Bench of the  Commission observed that  the disclosure of ACRs to the concerned employee cannot be  denied in the light of the decision / directions of Hon'ble  Apex Court in 'Dev Dutt Vs Union of India'.  Hence, in view  of the above, the orders of the Respondent are set aside and  the   Respondent   are   directed   to   provide   a   copies   of   the  desired ACRs to the Appellant.   The order of the Commission  may be complied within 15 days of receipt of the order. 

   

(Sushma Singh)                                                                            Information Commissioner  20.05.2010