Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 10]

Chattisgarh High Court

Manohar Lal Gupta vs State Of Chhattisgarh 40 Cont/275/2017 ... on 5 April, 2019

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra, Parth Prateem Sahu

1                                                        WA No. 207 of 2019


                                                                      NAFR

      HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                           WA No. 207 of 2019

     Manohar Lal Gupta S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Gupta Teacher (L.B.)
       But Wrongly Mention In Cause Title As Siksha Karmi Grade- 2,
       Janpad       Panchayat   And    Tahsil   Odagi,    District   Surajpur
       Chhattisgarh, Presently Posted As Mandal Sanyojak Block Odagi
       District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.                     ---- Appellant

                                   Versus

    1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of
        School Education Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atalnagar
        Disrtict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

    2. The Collector Surajpur Distt- Surajpur (C.G.).

    3. The District Education Officer Surajpur, District- Surajpur,
        Chhattisgarh.

    4. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development Surajpur, District-
        Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.

    5. Ramdev Paikra S/o Late Kariyaram Paikra Aged About 52 Years
        Occupation-Service, R/o Village Post And P.S. Odagi, District-
        Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.                          ---- Respondents



    For Appellant                 :-        Shri A.N. Pandey, Advocate.
    For Respondent-State          :-        Shri R.S. Baghel, Dy. A.G.



           Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag.CJ

                Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu,J.

Judgment On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ 2 WA No. 207 of 2019 05/04/2019

1. Challenge in this intra-Court appeal is to the interim order passed by the Learned Single Judge staying the transfer order affecting respondent No.5 herein (writ petitioner) for the reason that the order was passed at the instance of Member of Legislative Assembly.

2. The interim order being a reasoned order and the Writ Petition is still pending for consideration, we do not find any ground to interfere with the interim order.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is liable to be and is hereby dismissed.

             Sd/-                                      Sd/-
    (Prashant Kumar Mishra)                    (Parth Prateem Sahu)
       Acting Chief Justice                           Judge



Ayushi