Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

T.C.Praveen vs The Regional Provident Fund ... on 16 February, 2015

Author: K. Vinod Chandran

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                              PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

               FRIDAY,THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/20TH JYAISHTA, 1938

                            W.P.(C).No.36511 of 2015 (L)
                             -------------------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):-
------------------------

                   T.C.PRAVEEN
                   PROPRIETOR, GEM LIGHTS,
                   UNIVERSITY JUNCTION, CUSAT P.O,
                   KALAMASSERY, KOCHI - 682 022

                   BY ADVS.SRI.P.R.VENKETESH
                           SRI.G.KEERTHIVAS.


RESPONDENT(S):-
--------------------------

        1.         THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER,
                   EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION,
                   BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, KALOOR, KOCHI - 682 017.

        2.         THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND
                   RECOVERY OFFICER,
                   EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION,
                   BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, KALOOR, KOCHI 682 017


                   R1 & R2 BY ADV. DR.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.)
                   R1 & R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.S.PRASANTH.


           THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
10-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No.36511 of 2015 (L)
-------------------------------------

                                                APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:-
---------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 16-2-2015 FROM THE
                   1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18-02-2015 ISSUED BY THE
                   1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6-11-2015 ISSUED BY THE
                   1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 1-1-2015
                   FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE SAID JUDGMENT DATED 1-9-2014 IN
                   W.P(C) NO 22858/2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION IN 2014(4) KLT 538 OF
                   THIS HON'BLE COURT.


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS/ANNEXURES:-
--------------------------------------------------------------

ANNEXURE R1(a)              A STATEMENT SHOWING THE DETAILS OF REMITTANCE.

ANNEXURE R1(b)              TRUE COPOY OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
                            JUDFGMENT DATED 05.10.2009 IN RP.NO.937/2009.




Vku/-                                          [ true copy ]



                       K. Vinod Chandran, J
                  ----------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C) No.36511 of 2015-L
                  ----------------------------------------
              Dated this the 10th day of June, 2016

                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner is concerned with Exhibits P2 and P3 orders passed, respectively under Section 7Q and Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [for brevity "EPF Act"]. The petitioner contends that an appeal has been filed, with number as 124(7)/2016, before the Appellate Tribunal which is being constituted in Bangalore. The petitioner contends that if the recovery is made as of now, the appellate remedy would be frustrated.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Provident Fund Organisation would alertly point out that Exhibit P2 is an order passed under Section 7Q, where there can be no appeal filed. Payment of interest on amounts due is automatic, going by Section 7Q. In such circumstance, there can be no order with respect to Exhibit P2. Considering the fact that the amount claimed under Section 7Q is Rs.1,85,568/- [Rupees one WP(C) No.36511 of 2015 - 2 - lakh, eighty five thousand, five hundred and sixty eight], the petitioner shall be granted two months, starting from today, to pay the entire amounts.

3. With respect to the demand made under Section 14B, since an appeal and a stay application are pending before the Tribunal, the same shall be kept in abeyance on condition. The petitioner shall pay one-third of the demand made, within three months, upon which the proceedings shall be kept in abeyance till the appeal before the Tribunal is disposed of.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Sd/-

K.Vinod Chandran Judge.

vku/-

[ true copy ]