Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Bhinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab on 21 August, 2015

Author: T.P.S. Mann

Bench: T.P.S. Mann

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                              AT CHANDIGARH


                                                                    CRM M-21411 of 2015
                                                         Date of Decision : August 21, 2015

                        Bhinder Kaur
                                                                                 .....Petitioner
                                                       VERSUS
                        State of Punjab
                                                                               .....Respondent

                        CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN
                        Present :    Mr. F.S.Virk, Advocate

                                     Mr. Vikram Bishnoi, Asstt. A.G., Punjab

                        T.P.S. MANN, J. (Oral)

This is the second petition filed by Bhinder Kaur- petitioner for the grant of regular bail, the first one having been dismissed as withdrawn on 13.2.2014.

As per the prosecution, the petitioner was found in possession of 350 grams of intoxicating powder which on analysis was found to contain diphenoxylate as its active ingredient.

On the last date of hearing, the State counsel had informed the Court that the petitioner was involved in four more criminal cases, one under the NDPS Act while the other three under various provisions of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not in a position to controvert the stand taken by the State counsel on the last date of hearing. However, according to him, the petitioner was convicted in one of the earlier cases under Section 15 of the AJAY KUMAR 2015.08.21 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CRM M-21411 of 2015 -2- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and she has already served the sentence imposed in the said case.

After obtaining instructions from ASI Krishan Lal, learned State counsel has informed the Court that out of the ten witnesses cited by prosecution four have already been examined and now the trial is fixed for today itself for remaining evidence.

In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.

( T.P.S. MANN ) JUDGE August 21, 2015 ajay-1 AJAY KUMAR 2015.08.21 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh