Karnataka High Court
Ismail S/O Mohmadsab Honyal vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors on 14 June, 2022
Author: S. Vishwajith Shetty
Bench: S. Vishwajith Shetty
1 W.P.No.201336/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO.201336/2022 (GM-POL)
BETWEEN:
Ismail S/o Mohmmadsab Honyal,
Age: 35 Years, Occ: Agriculture,
R/o Kolhar (K), Tq: Kolhar,
Dist. Vijayapur.
... Petitioner
(By Sri Ganesh Naik, Advocate)
AND:
1. The State of Karnataka
Through the Secretary,
Mines and Minerals,
Govt. of Karnataka,
Vikas Soudha, Bengaluru-01.
2. The Deputy Commissioner,
Vijayapur, Vist. Vijayapur-585101.
3. The Karnataka State
Pollution Control Board
Through its Director,
Zonal Office, Plot No.12/2,
Sy.No.19/PA, Manasfadar Layout,
Kalaburagi, Dist. Kalaburagi-585106.
2 W.P.No.201336/2022
4. The Senior Geologist,
Concerned Geology, Vijayapur,
Tq. and Dist. Vijayapur-584101.
5. Mallappa S/o Shankreppa Nadagoudar,
Age: Major, Occ: Business,
Proprietor of M/s. Holebasaveshwar Stone Crusher,
Land Sy.No.174/3, Baluti Village,
Tq: Kolhar, Dist: Vijayapur-584101.
6. Bandenawaz S/o Mehboobsab Giriganvi,
Age: Major, Occ: Business,
Proprietor of Bharat Stone Crushers,
Sy.No.175, Baluti Village,
Tq: Kolhar, Dist: Vijayapur-584101.
7. Kallappa S. Desai,
Age: Major, Occ: Business,
Proprietor of M/s. Desai Stone Crusher,
Sy.No.175/*/2, Baluti Village,
Tq: Kolhar, Dist: Vijayapur-584101.
... Respondents
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, praying to a writ of mandamus
directing the respondent No.1 to 4 stop the operation of the
stone crushing machines operated by respondents No.5 to 7
in land Sy.No.174/3, 175 and 175/*/2 of Baluti village, Tq:
Kolhar, Dist: Vijayapur and etc.
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the Court
made the following:
ORDER
Having regard to the office objections raised by the Registry, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 3 W.P.No.201336/2022 he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and file appropriate writ petition before the Bench which holds roaster for this subject.
Having regard to the said submission petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
The Registry is directed to return the original of the documents which have been produced by the petitioner.
Sd/-
JUDGE sn