Supreme Court - Daily Orders
Dharmendra Kumar Paliwal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 April, 2022
Bench: Chief Justice, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli
1
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.32/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09092021
in MCRC No. 44598/2021 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Gwalior)
DHARMENDRA KUMAR PALIWAL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 719/2022 EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT, IA No. 18843/2022 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No.
721/2022 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND IA No. 718/2022
PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 20042022 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, AOR
Mr. Parikshit Ahuja, Adv.
Mr. Kartik Lahoti, Adv.
Ms. Praveena Bisht, Adv.
Ms. Madhur Jhavar, Adv.
Ms. Vindhya Mehra, Adv.
Mr. Shashank Garg, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR
Mr. Nishant Verma, Adv.
Mr. Shreyash Bhardwaj, Adv.
Mr. Manu Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
VISHAL ANAND
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Date: 2022.04.20
18:10:14 IST
Reason:
O R D E R
1. This Court on 1212022 passed the following order.: “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2The petitioner is directed to implead the complainant as a party respondent and file the amended memo of parties accordingly.
Issue notice.
In the meantime, interim protection against arrest is granted to the petitioner herein.
However, the petitioner is directed to cooperate with the investigation at all stages. Additionally, the interim protection is also subject to the compliance of other conditions, as enumerated in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to the petitioner.”
2. Exemptions are allowed.
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State of Madhya Pradesh, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 – complainant and perused the relevant material available on record.
4. Taking into consideration the fact that more than 3 months have passed since passing of the said interim Order and nothing has been brought on record by the State to show that the petitioner has misused the concession of interim protection granted to him, we make the said interim Order dated 1212022, absolute.
5. The Special Leave Petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms.
6. Pending applications filed in the matter also stand disposed of.
(VISHAL ANAND) (R.S. NARAYANAN) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH)