Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 151]

Kerala High Court

Thalappalam Service Co-Operative Bank ... vs Kerala State Co-Operative Rubber ... on 31 October, 2013

Author: V. Chitambaresh

Bench: V.Chitambaresh

       

  

   

 
 
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

              MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/15TH POUSHA, 1936

                                  WP(C).No. 7780 of 2014 (V)
                                  -----------------------------------

PETITIONER:
--------------------------

           THALAPPALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3937
           PLASSANAL, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT
           RERPESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MOLYKURIAN

           BY ADVS.SRI.P.V.BABY
                        SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH

RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------

       1.           KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE RUBBER MARKETING
                    FEDERATION LTD.
                    P.B NO.15, GHANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI 682020

       2.           THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERAITVE SOCIETIES,
                    TRIVANDRUM 695001

                    R1 BY ADVS. SRI.JAGAN ABRAHAM M. GEORGE
                                 SRI.P.JAYABAL MENON
                    R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.R. RAJESH

           THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
           05-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
          FOLLOWING:




DCS

WP(C).No. 7780 of 2014 (V)
---------------------------------------

                                           APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :-
----------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE DATE OF
                    DEPOSIT AMOUNT RATE OF INTEREST, INTEREST DUE AND DUE
                    DATE OF THE PETITIONER WITH THE IST RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 31-10-2013
                    ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 07.06.2008 SENT BY
                    THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.05.2009 SENT BY
                    THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-
---------------------------------------

EXHIBIT R1(a)                 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. NO. 1202/2007
                              DATED 24.05.2007

EXHIBIT R1(b)                 COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING CONVENED BY
                              THE HON'BLE MINISTER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ON
                              11.03.2014




                                                          /TRUE COPY/


                                                          P.A. TO JUDGE




DCS



                   V. CHITAMBARESH, J
            ---------------------------------------
                 W.P.(C). NO. 7780 OF 2014
            ----------------------------------------
            Dated this the 05th day of January, 2015

                             JUDGMENT

The limited prayer put forth is for a direction to pay the amount due under three fixed deposits which have matured. The following are the details of the fixed deposits made by the petitioner with the first respondent Federation:-

i) F.D. No. 04349 - Rs. 10 Lakhs
ii) F.D. No. 04324 - Rs. 10 Lakhs
iii) F.D. No. 04859 - Rs. 30 Lakhs

2. Ext. P3 letter reflects that the fixed deposit receipts have been surrendered by the petitioner to the first respondent as early as on 07.06.2008. There is no justification in not disbursing the amount even after the expiry of about six years thereafter. The acceptance of the fixed deposits from the petitioner and the liability of the first respondent is not seriously disputed. The first respondent has a case that the fixed deposits made by the petitioner have been renewed time and again. There cannot be any unilateral renewal of fixed deposits after the same is surrendered as evident by Exts. P3 and P4 letters.

3. The writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to release the principal amount due under the W.P.(C). NO. 7780 OF 2014 2 fixed deposit receipts referred to above within a period of three months. There is however a serious dispute with regard to the amount liable to be paid to the petitioner by way of interest. The petitioner is free to invoke the remedy under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act for realisation of the amount due as interest on the fixed deposit receipts referred to above.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS