Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd vs Pullayya Naidu Chennu And Anr And Court ... on 19 December, 2018

Author: G.S. Kulkarni

Bench: G.S. Kulkarni

                                            1                               906-chs 1341-18

psv
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                          CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1341 OF 2018
                                         IN
                         ARBITRATION PETITION NO.294 OF 2018

      Tata Capital Financial Services Limited                ..Applicant
      In the matter between
      Tata Capital Financial Services Limited                ..Petitioner
                   Vs.
      Pullayya Naidu Chennu & Anr.                           ..Respondents
                   And
      Court Receiver                                         ..Respondent
                                         -----
      Mr.Shlok Parekh i/b. M/s.Law Square for Applicant.
                                      -----
                                     CORAM :    G.S. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 19th DECEMBER, 2018 P.C.:

By this Chamber Summons, the applicant/petitioner prays that the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay, appointed as a Receiver in respect of the mortgaged property as mentioned in the prayer clause be discharged.

2. By an order dated 3 May 2018 this Court had appointed the Court Receiver as receiver of the said property. The applicant contends that thereafter the respondents approached the applicant and have regularized the loan account and thus, there is no further need for a receiver in respect of the said premises. Accordingly, the applicant seeks discharge of the Court Receiver.

::: Uploaded on - 24/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 25/12/2018 21:34:05 :::

2 906-chs 1341-18

3. I have heard learned Counsel for the applicant and also perused the order dated 3 May 2018 and averments as made in the affidavit in support of chamber summons.

4. In the above circumstances, the receiver is required to be discharged. Accordingly, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads thus:-

"a) that the Court Receiver, High Court Bombay be discharged in respect of the mortgaged property being No.26-53/1/1, Ts No.188, Sy. No.182/3, Chinagantyada Village, Gajuwaka, Zone V, Visakhapatnam more particularly described in "Exhibit D" to the Petition without passing of accounts."

5. The Court Receiver is discharged without passing accounts, however, this shall be subject to the payment of necessary fees, charges, etc. as payable to the Court Receiver. The said charges be informed to the applicant within a period of two weeks from today. The payment of charges shall be condition precedent for such discharge.

6. Chamber summons is made absolute in the above terms. No costs.

[G.S. KULKARNI, J.] ::: Uploaded on - 24/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 25/12/2018 21:34:05 :::