Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

St. Catherines Home vs Deepak Shivdas Jaiswal And Mamta Deepak ... on 20 January, 2021

Author: N. J. Jamadar

Bench: N. J. Jamadar

                                                       2-IAP43-2020AWJO89-2020.DOC

                                                                             Santosh
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                           IN ITS GENERAL AND INHERENT JURISDICTION

                             INDIAN ADOPTION PETITION NO. 43 OF 2020
                                              WITH
                                  JUDGE'S ORDER NO. 89 OF 2020
                                               IN
                             INDIAN ADOPTION PETITION NO. 43 OF 2020

                                                Hridhaya Deepak Jaiswal - Minor

                   St. Catherine's Home                    ...Petitioner/Applicant
                                     And
                   Deepak Shivdas Jaiswal
                   Mamta Deepak Jaiswal                    ...Prospective Adoptive
                                                                         Parents

                   Mr. Rakesh Kapoor, for the Petitioner.
                   Mr.O. Hareendran, Representative of ICSW present.
                   Mr. Arun Kesarkar, 2nd Asstt. Master present.

                                            CORAM:     N. J. JAMADAR, J.
                                            DATED :    20th JANUARY, 2021
                   PC:-

                   1.     This petition under section 56 of the Juvenile Justice

                   (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred

                   to as 'the Act, 2015') is preferred by St. Catherine's Home, a

                   specialized adoption agency. The petitioner seeks an order

                   permitting adoption of a female child born on 19 th November,

                   2019, and entrusted to its custody by an order dated 7 th

                   January, 2020, passed by the Child Welfare Committee (II),
V. S.
Parekar            Mumbai Suburban District.      The petition is supported by an
Digitally signed
by V. S. Parekar
Date: 2021.01.21

                                                 1/4
17:53:42 +0530
                                        2-IAP43-2020AWJO89-2020.DOC

affdavit of Sister Cicily Chiramal, Authorized Signatory and

Convener of the petitioner.

2.    Perused the report of Mr. O. Hareendran, Scrutiny Offcer

of Indian Council of Social Welfare.

3.   The minor is a surrendered child. The Child Welfare

Committee, after an enquiry envisaged by Section 38 of the Act,

2015, has declared the child legally free for adoption, by its

order dated 24th June, 2020.

4.   The adoption Committee, in its meeting held on 18 th

August, 2020 has approved the proposal of the prospective

adoptive parents Mr. Deepak Shivdas Jaiswal and Mrs. Mamta

Deepak Jaiswal to adopt the child.       The Adoption Committee

found that the prospective adoptive parents are suitable to

adopt the child.

5.   The child study report and medical examination of the

child reveal that the child is developmentally "Normal". The HIV

test report of the minor dated 9 th January, 2020 is "Negative".

The prospective adoptive parents have perused and understood

the contents of the medical examination report of the child and

have shown willingness to accept the child as their child.

6.   The marriage of the prospective adoptive parents was

solemnized on 5th May, 2005. They have no biological child. The

prime motivation for the decision to adopt a child seems to be
                               2/4
                                        2-IAP43-2020AWJO89-2020.DOC

the inability to have a biological child. The prospective adoptive

parents have claimed that despite having conceived on 3 to 4

occasions the prospective mother could not successfully carry

the pregnancy. They, thus, intend to adopt the child to complete

the family.

7.    The     Home    Study   Report   strongly    recommends     the

proposal for adoption.        It, inter-alia,     records that the

prospective adoptive parents are family oriented, loving, caring

and responsible. They share a stable marital relationship for 12

years. They are educated and fnancially secure. Their decision

to adopt a child has the support of their family members.

8.    The prospective adoptive father is working as Senior

Associate Sales with Ingram Micro India Private Limited. The

salary certifcate for the month of August-2020 indicates that

the gross salary was Rs.56,379/- and the net salary was

Rs.49,953/-. The prospective adoptive mother is a homemaker.

It appears that they are well placed in life.         Their fnancial

position is reasonably stable.

9.    The decision of the prospective adoptive parents to adopt a

child seems to have been well received by their family members

and well-wishers. Mr. Pankaj Jaiswal and Mrs. Dipika Jaiswal,

the   brother   and    sister-in-law   of   the   prospective   father

Mr. Deepak Shivdas Jaiswal have submitted an undertaking to
                                 3/4
                                         2-IAP43-2020AWJO89-2020.DOC

look after, maintain and educate the child in an unforeseen

eventuality.

10.   In the light of the aforesaid material and the totality of the

circumstances, I am of the considered view that the adoptive

parents are physically ft, fnancially sound, mentally alert and

highly motivated to adopt the child. They have the potential to

provide a good upbringing to the child. Thus, the petition

deserves to be allowed.

11.   Hence the following order :

                              ORDER

(i) The petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d).

(ii) The child shall not be offered for further adoption.

(iii) Undertakings are accepted.

(iv) Judge's order is signed separately. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 4/4