Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Centrum Capital Limited vs Shriram Epc Limited on 10 July, 2024

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar

2024:BHC-OS:10110                                                    7-CARBPL-32042-2023.DOC




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                      COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.32042 OF 2023


                    Centrum Capital Limited                                  ...Petitioner
                          Versus
                    Shriram EPC Limited                                      ...Respondent


                    Ms. Ankita Singhania a/w. Mr. Noel Thomas, Mr. Saahil Memon
                    and Mr. Siddhartha Srivastava, Advocates, i/b. Link Legal, for the
                    Petitioner.
                    Ms. Rajalakshmy Mohandas a/w. Ms. Mukta Chorge, Mr. Nehal
                    Farukh Azam, Advocates, i/b. Rajalakshmy Associates, for the
                    Respondents.


                                               CORAM:     MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                                               DATED :    10th JULY 2024
                    P. C.:


                    1.       The Petitioner seeks following reliefs in the present

                    Commercial Arbitration Petition:



                              a) That this Hon'ble Court in exercise of its powers
                              under Section 14(1)(a) of the Arbitration and
                              Conciliation    Act,    1996    be     pleased    to
                              nominate/appoint any person, as this Hon'ble Court
                              may deem fit in terms of the Arbitration Clause IX
                              of the Agreement dated 27th February 2014, as a
                              substitute arbitrator to decide and adjudicate the
                              disputes and differences between the parties;

                              b) that this Hon'ble Court in exercise of its powers
                              under Section 29A of the Arbitration and



                                                     Page 1 of 3
                    Sonali

                ::: Uploaded on - 10/07/2024                       ::: Downloaded on - 12/07/2024 04:51:16 :::
                                                          7-CARBPL-32042-2023.DOC




           Conciliation Act, 1996 be pleased to extend the
           period for making of an award by the substitute
           arbitrator by a period of six months or such further
           period as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit;"


 2.       Learned       Counsel   appearing      for     the     Petitioner       and

 Respondent state that the learned Arbitrator appointed by Order

 dated 26th July 2018 by the learned Single Judge in Commercial

 Arbitration Petition No.71 of 2018 has been elevated as a Judge of

 this Court. Both of them by consent therefore state that a new

 Arbitrator be appointed.



 3.       Accordingly, Mr. R. D. Dhanuka, Chief Justice (Retd.) of

 Bombay High Court is appointed as the new Arbitrator.



 4.       In view thereof, the following Order is passed:



                                    ORDER

(a) Mr. R. D. Dhanuka, Chief Justice (Retd.) of Bombay High Court is appointed as the sole Arbitrator to decide the disputes between the parties arising out of Agreement dated 20 th February 2014.

Page 2 of 3 Sonali ::: Uploaded on - 10/07/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 12/07/2024 04:51:16 ::: 7-CARBPL-32042-2023.DOC

(b) Learned sole Arbitrator to furnish the disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to the parties.

5. Both the learned Counsel state that in the facts and circumstances of this case, the period for passing Award under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 be extended by 12 months from today. Accordingly, the period for passing Award under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 stands extended by 12 months from today

6. The Commercial Arbitration Petition is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.




                                                    [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

                 Digitally
                 signed by
                 SONALI
  SONALI         MILIND
  MILIND         PATIL
  PATIL          Date:
                 2024.07.10
                 18:14:16
                 +0530




                                      Page 3 of 3
 Sonali

::: Uploaded on - 10/07/2024                         ::: Downloaded on - 12/07/2024 04:51:16 :::