Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 32]

Orissa High Court

Haresh Chandra Nandi vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opp. ... on 3 January, 2022

Author: Biswajit Mohanty

Bench: Biswajit Mohanty

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                            CRLMP No.2361 of 2021

                 Haresh Chandra Nandi                 ....          Petitioner

                                    Mr. B. Dash,
                                    Advocate

                                         -versus-
                 State of Odisha & others             ....       Opp. Parties

                                    Mr. S.K. Samal,
                                    Additional Government Advocate

                                  CORAM:
                         JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY
                                      ORDER

Order No. 03.01.2022

01. 1. This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.

2. Heard Mr. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.K. Samal, learned Additional Government Advocate through video conferencing mode.

3. According to Mr. Dash, the grievance of the petitioner in this case pertains to non-registration of his complaint dated 14.12.2021 under Annexure-1 sent through the O.I.C., Mahalhat Out Post as F.I.R. by the I.I.C., Kishore Nagar Police Station though the same reveals commission of cognizable offences.

4. During course of hearing, Mr. Dash submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to move the Superintendent of Police (Rural), Cuttack (opposite party No.2) in the matter by filing a grievance petition and the said opposite party be directed to take a decision on such motion within a specific time period.

5. Considering the submissions made and without Prasant expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court // 2 // grants liberty to the petitioner to file a grievance petition before opposite party No.2 through registered post within a period of two weeks from today. In the event, such a petition is filed along with a certified copy of this order, the opposite party No.2 is directed to take a decision on the same in accordance with law keeping in mind the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in AIR 2014 SC 187 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such grievance petition and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this CRLMP is disposed of.

7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( Biswajit Mohanty) Judge Page 2 of 2