Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Amod Kumar Verma vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 8 August, 2011

Author: D. N.  Patel

Bench: D. N.  Patel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI     
             W.P.(S) No. 890 of 2011
Amod Kumar Verma                     ...... Petitioner 
                       Versus 
The State of Jharkhand & others         ......Respondents  
CORAM:         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N.  PATEL  
For the Petitioner     : M/s Sujit Narayan Prasad, B. Burman, Advocates
For the State            : J.C. to G.P.­II 
             th
 02/Dated: 8    August, 2011
                             

1.

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was initially  working as Class­IV employee and was promoted to Class­III employee vide  order dated 20th October, 2008 and for no justifiable reason, the promotion  of the petitioner has been withdrawn and demoted vide order dated 29th  November,   2010,   vide   order   at   Annexure­8   to   the   memo   of   the   present  petition. 

2. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that in the  earlier   matter,  necessary   orders   were   passed   to   consider   the   case   of   the  petitioner   by   the   Selection   Committee   and   ultimately,   in   contempt  application, reply was filed by the Secretary of the concerned department  that they are giving promotion to the petitioner and this is how the earlier  contempt   application   was   brought   to   an   end.   Now,   the   respondents   are  saying that the petitioner was wrongly given promotion and it was wrongly  given by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission and therefore, the stand  taken   today   is   in   contradiction   with   the   stand   taken   in   the   contempt  application in affidavit, filed by the Secretary of the concerned department. 

3. In view of these facts, counsel for the respondents is seeking time to  file further affidavit of the Secretary of the concerned department. 

4. Time, as prayed for, is granted. 

5. Post this matter on 19th August, 2011.

 

                            (D.N. Patel, J.)  VK/­