Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

M/S Backyard Garden Pvt. Ltd vs State Of H.P. And Others on 9 March, 2021

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Chander Bhusan Barowalia

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
                              SHIMLA.
                                                                   CWP No. 5532 of 2020




                                                                                   .

                                                                  Decided on: 09.03.2021
                 M/s Backyard Garden Pvt. Ltd.                            ...Petitioner.
                                               Versus





            State of H.P. and others                 ...Respondents.
    ___________________________________________________________________
          Coram:
          Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.





               Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.
               Whether approved for reporting? 1 No

               For the Petitioner:                Mr. Jagmohan Chandel, Advocate.

               For the Respondents:               Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General, with
                                                  Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr.
                                                  Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl.A.Gs., Mr. J.S.
                                                  Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.



                                                  A.Gs., for respondents No. 1 to 3.

                                                  Mr. Anuj Gupta and Mr. Rohit Sharma,




                                                  Advocate, for respondent No.4.
               _________________________________________________________
               Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.(Oral)

Since the lease in favour of respondent No.4 that had been impugned in this writ petition has been cancelled, therefore, the instant petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

2. The aggrieved party shall be at liberty to approach the competent Court for redressal of his/her 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes ::: Downloaded on - 09/03/2021 20:22:20 :::HCHP 2 grievances. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Chander Bhusan Barowalia) 9 th March, 2021. Judge (GR) r to ::: Downloaded on - 09/03/2021 20:22:20 :::HCHP