Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1368]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Triveni Prasad Bahuguna vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 6 September, 2012

                  Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
           Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

                   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000906  

Appellant /Complainant        :     Sh. Triveni Prasad Bahuguna, 
Lucknow     
Public Authority              :    LIC of India, Lucknow 
                              (Sh. R.K. Agarwal, cPIO, Sh. DPS 
Rathor, AA, Sh. A.K. 
                              Tripathi & Sh. M.K. Ravat, APIO - 
through video
                              Conferencing)  

Date of Hearing               :     06 September  2012 
Date of Decision              :     06 September 2012
  
Facts:­ 

 1. Appellant submitted  his RTI application dated 15 January  2012 before the CPIO, LIC of India, Lucknow seeking details in  respect   of   the   revival   of   his   health   policy   no.   218991849  through 7 points.

2. Vide   CPIO   Order   dated   15   February   2012,   CPIO   provided  point wise information to the Appellant.

3. The   Appellant   preferred   first   Appeal   to   the   First  Appellate Authority dated 6 March 2012.

4. Vide   FAA   Order   dated   6   March   2012,   FAA   informed   the  Appellant that his policy has been foreclosed.

5. Being   aggrieved   and   not   being   satisfied   by   the   above  response   of   the   public   authority,   the   appellant   preferred  second appeal before the Commission.

6. Matter   was   heard   today   via   videoconferencing.   Both   the  Parties were present at Lucknow. 

7. Respondents submitted that information as available with  them has been provided to the Appellant and they have offered  to re verify Appellant's grievance.

   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000906       

8. Appellant   submitted   that   reasons   for   the   foreclosure   of  his health policy have not been provided by the Respondents.

Decision Notice

9. After hearing both the parties the Commission is of the  view   that   in   the   present   case,   the   Appellant   seeks   the  redressal   of   his   grievance   regarding   the   foreclosure   of   his  health policy.

10. The Appellant is informed that Commission   redressal of  grievance   does   not     fall   within   the   ambit   of     the   RTI   Act  rather   it   is   up   to   the   Appellant   to   approach   the   correct  grievance redressal forum of the Public Authority to initiate  the matter further. 

11. Commission   is   satisfied   that   complete   information   has  been provided to the Appellant.

12. With above Observations the present appeal is dismissed,  the case is closed.

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­
1. Shri Triveni Prasad Bahuguna C­85, Sector­A, Mahanagar Lucknow­226006
2. The CPIO Manager (CRM) LIC of India, Divisional Office  Jeevan Prakash, 30, Hazratganj, PB No. 111 Lucknow­226001 (UP)    Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000906       
3. The Appellate Authority Sr. Divisional Manager LIC of India, Divisional Office  Jeevan Prakash, 30, Hazratganj, PB No. 111 Lucknow­226001 (UP)         Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000906