Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Tapan Kumar Manna & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 17 June, 2022

Author: Moushumi Bhattacharya

Bench: Moushumi Bhattacharya

17.06.2022
sayandeep
Sl. No. 02
Ct. No. 05


                                 WPA 8139 of 2018
                                       With
                                 IA NO:CAN/2/2022

                           Tapan Kumar Manna & Ors.
                                   -Versus-
                              Union of India & Ors.

                   Mr. Ramdulal Manna
                   Ms. Manju Manna(Dey)
                   Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal
                   Mr. Sayan Mukherjee
                                               ...... for the petitioners

                   Mr. Debasish Saha

                                                       .... for the S.B.I.

             Mr. M. M. Verma
                                                      ..... for the U.O.I.


                   It appears from the order dated 24.03.2021 that

             the petitioner's name has been wrongly described in the

             cause title of the orders passed by the Court.          the

             petitioner's name is Tapan Kumar Manna and the last

             of   the   dated   13.06.2022   should    accordingly    be

             corrected.

                   The petitioner had filed CAN 2 of 2022, to

             challenge Notice dated 18.04.2022 of the Ministry of

             Home Affairs/Grih Mantralaya of the Government of

             India by which the Ministry had stated that the

             petitioners' case has been examined afresh and has

             reiterated its earlier decision communicated by a letter
                               2




dated 9/10 March, 2022.        The petitioners' documents

have been     returned with the    request to furnish the

documents as requested by the letter dated 9/10

March, 2022.

      The letter dated 9/10 March, 2022 was issued in

response to a representation made on behalf of the

petitioners dated 14.01.2022 in connection with the

payment of Life time Arrear(LTA) to the petitioners from

23.02.2016-18.090.2020. The petitioners are the only

legal heirs of one late Smt. Kamal Manna, wife of one

late Sri Jatindra Nath Manna. The petitioners are the

one son and three married daughters of late Jatindra

Nath Manna and Smt. Kamala Manna. Smt. Kamala

Manna was initially the sole petitioner in the writ

petition and is a widow of late Jatindra Nath Manna

who   died    on    22.02.2016.    Smt.   Kamala   Manna

thereafter applied for grant of family pension under the

Swatantrata Sainik Samman pension(Yojana) Scheme,

1980 which had been sanctioned in favour of Jatindra

Nath Manna by way of Pension Payment Order on

04.09.1986.        Kamala Manna's application for family

pension was made on 30.06.2016 which was also

sanctioned, would appear from the Pension Payment

Order granted in favour of         Kamala Manna's' late

husband.

      Upon the death of Kamala Manna on 19.09.2020,

the present petitioners applied for substitution which
                              3




was allowed by an order of coordinate Bench on

09.02.2021.    The petitioners as the legal heirs and

successors of late Jatindra Nath Manna and late

Kamala Manna were brought on record.

      The issue which is to be adjudicated is whether

the impugned letters of the Ministry of Home Affairs

dated 9/10 March, 2022 and 18th April, 2022 can be

sustained. The said letters directed that the petitioners

should furnish a Succession Certificate under Section

372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and other

documents      including Bank Account            details and

attested copies of PAN Card and Aadhaar Card. There

is no controversy in relation to the Bank account details

and PAN Card and Aadhaar Card.          The only issue is

whether the petitioners are required to produce the

Succession    Certificate   as   directed   by    the   Home

Ministry.

      The petitioners' claim is for Lifetime Arrears of

family pension from 26.06.2016-18.09.2020. The only

fact which the petitioners are hence required to prove is

that the petitioners are the only legal heirs and

representative of the late Kamala Manna but as the

widow of the late Jatindra Nath Manna, was also

sanctioned the family pension under the Freedom

Fighters Schemes.     An order passed by a coordinate

Bench on 06.12.2021 in WPA 13499 of 2021 (Subhas

Chandra Khatua & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.) was
                                4




on identical facts.     In that case, the petitioners had

approached the writ court against a demand of a

Succession Certificate for the purpose of grant of

accrued pensionary dues which were payable to the late

mother of the petitioners before the Court.          Upon

considering the relevant Judgment including of Smt.

Savitri Devi & Anr. vs. District & Sessions Judge,

Hanumangarh as well as the decision of the Kerala High

Court in WPA 556 of 2014, the Court held that although

a copy of the Succession Certificate may be necessary to

be produced in case        where the evidence of Heirship

Certificate is required, there     is no such requirement

where the petitioners have been able to prove that they

are the only lawful claimant to the debt payable by the

Union of India.        The Court accepted the Heirship

Certificate of the local authorities as evidence in this

respect. The present case fits entirely with the decision

of the coordinate Bench in (Subhas Chandra Khatua &

Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.).      The petitioners have

produced an Heirship Certificate dated 17.03.2022 from

the concerned Gram Panchayat which has been signed

by the Pradhan.        The Certificate states that the four

petitioners before the Court are the only legal heirs of

late Jatindra Nath Manna and late Kamala Manna. It is

also   states   that    Smt.   Kamala    Manna    died   on

09.09.2020 leaving behind the four petitioners as her

only legal heirs. Section 372 of the Indian succession
                            5




Act, 1925 makes it clear that Pension receivable by the

petitioners on account of the death of a parent is not

debt within the meaning of the said provisions. Hence,

there can be no requirement of producing a Succession

Certificate in facts which are present before this Court.

Moreover, one of the impugned       documents of being

9/10th March, 2022 states the names of all the four

petitioners before this Court as the legal heirs of late

Smt. Kamala Manna.       The Home Ministry, therefore

having taken its stand, cannot insist upon a Succession

Certificate particularly when there is an order of this

Court as stated above.     The Certificate of the local

Administration should be deemed to be sufficient for the

evidence of the fact that the petitioners are the only

legal heirs and representative of late Jatindra Nath

Manna and late Smt. Kamala Manna.

      This Court is hence of the view that the

requirement in the impugned letters of 9/10th March,

2022 and 18th April. 2022 cannot be sustained and the

said documents are hence cancelled.     The respondent

No. 3 being the under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Freedom Fighters' Division, is hence directed to release the Lifetime Arrears of pension to the petitioners for the period of 23.02.2016-18.09.2020 on the basis of the Heirship Certificate dated 17.03.2022 within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. 6 Since there has been an admitted delay on the part of the Ministry, the said amount shall be disbursed to the petitioners along with interest at 6% on the amount payable to the petitioners which shall be included in the same to be disbursed to the petitioners.

WPA 8139 of 2018 and CAN 2 of 2022 are accordingly disposed of in terms of the above.

(Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)