Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Vijayalakshmi C Ullal vs The Commissioner on 27 June, 2024

Author: H.T. Narendra Prasad

Bench: H.T. Narendra Prasad

                                                   -1-
                                                              NC: 2024:KHC:23915
                                                            WP No. 21848 of 2022




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024

                                                  BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
                             WRIT PETITION NO. 21848 OF 2022 (LB-RES)
                      BETWEEN:

                      SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI C ULLAL
                      W/O LATE CHIDANANDA ULLAL
                      AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
                      NO.362/2, SAI ANUGRUHA
                      NEAR ALLALASANDRA MAIN ROAD
                      JUDICIAL LAYOUT, POST GKVK
                      BENGALURU 560065.                          ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K.,ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE COMMISSIONER
                            MANGALORE MAHANAGRA PALIKE,
                            BALLALBAGH, MANGALORE 575003.

                      2.    DAKSHINA KANNADA NIRMITHI KENDRA
Digitally signed by         NITK, SRINIVASNAGAR
HEMALATHA A
                            A GOVT OF KARNATAKA UNIT
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                    SURATHKAL, MANGALURU
KARNATAKA                   REP.BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                            DK DISTRICT-575025.

                      3.    VINAYANETRA DADDALKAD
                            S/O DEVENDRA
                            AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

                      4.    D PRASANNA
                            S/O LATE D SRIDHARA
                            AGED MAJOR
                              -2-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC:23915
                                       WP No. 21848 of 2022




  5. GANAPATHI KATTE SEVASAMITHI
     REP. VINAYANETRA DADDALKAD R3

    R3 TO R5 ARE R/AT DADADALKAD
    DEREBAIL, POST ASHOK NAGAR
    MANGALORE-575006.                   ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY H.,ADVOCATE FOR R1:
SMT B SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R2:
NOTICE TO R3 TO R5 ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UDNER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
DIRECT THE R1 TO TAKE ACTION FOR REMOVAL OF THE
UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION OPPOSITE THE PROPERTY OF
THE PETITIONER DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE AND DIRECT
THE R1 TO STOP ALL ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION OVER THE
PUBLIC STREET OPPOSITE TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AT
KSRTC-KOTTARA ROAD AT MANGALORE AND ETC.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR       PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
                           ORDER

This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:

"(i) Directing the respondent No.1 to take action for removal of the unauthorized construction opposite the property of the petitioner described in the schedule.
(ii) Directing the respondent No.1 to stop all illegal construction over the public street opposite to the schedule property at KSRTC-Kottara road at Mangalore.
-3-

NC: 2024:KHC:23915 WP No. 21848 of 2022

(iii) Direct the respondent No.1 to maintain the public street opposite to the schedule property at KSRTC-Kottara road at Mangalore without any construction, obstruction."

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the land bearing Sy.No.101 J, measuring 0.50 cents of Derebail village, Mangalore Taluk. In between the petitioner's property and the KSRTC main road, there is vacant land belonging to the first respondent

- Corporation. The respondent Nos. 3 to 5 have illegally put up construction on the land, which belongs to the first respondent. Therefore, the petitioner gave a representation to the first respondent vide Annexure-E on 14.10.2022. Inspite of that, the first respondent has not taken any action. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law -4- NC: 2024:KHC:23915 WP No. 21848 of 2022 and the decision of the Corporation will be communicated to the petitioner.

4. Since the representation submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-E dated 14.10.2022 to the first respondent is pending and no action has been taken, it is suffice for this Court to direct the first respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If it is found that respondent Nos. 3 to 5 have encroached the property of the first respondent, the first respondent is directed to remove the encroachment.

5. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71