Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Jagrat Adivasi Dalit Sangathan Thru. ... vs Shri Radhe Shyam Julania (Ias) / Shri P. ... on 7 February, 2017

              Contempt Petition No. 595 of 2016

07/02/2017
      Shri A.K. Chitale, learned Senior Advocate along with
petitioner Ms. Madhuri Krishnaswami.
        Shri Rohit Kumar Mangal, learned Govt. Advocate for
the respondent Nos.1 and 3 to 6.

Shri Vivek Patwa, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

  I.   A.   No.706/2017  has   been   filed   by   respondent No.2   for   deleting   his   name   from   the   array   of   the respondents. 

It   is   submitted   that   the   respondent   No.2   is   the Additional   Chief   Secretary   of   State   of   M.P.   and   Vice Chairman   of   Narmada   Valley   Development     Authority, whereas   the   project   in   question   is   of   Water   Resources Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh.

Considering the aforesaid, the prayer for deleting the name   of     Respondent   No.2   from   the   array   of   the respondents is allowed. Necessary correction be carried out during the course of the day. 

I. A. No.706/2017 stands disposed of. 

Shri   Rohit   Kumar   Mangal,   learned   Government Advocate   for   the   respondent   Nos.   1   and   3   to   6,   has submitted   that,   as   per   Para­53   of   the   order   dated 18.7.2016, they paid the amount to 216 affected families and in respect of   list of 19 affected families, he prays for and   is   granted   three   days   time   to   pay   the   amount   and supply details to Ms. Madhuri Krishnaswami, who is one of the applicant in contempt petition.

Shri A. K. Chitale, learned Senior Counsel has drawn our attention to the order passed by the Apex Court and submitted that the State Government shall constitute three Grievances   Redressal   Committees   within   15   days   from 5.1.2017 but till today no Committee has been constituted. He has also drawn our attention to Para­4 of the affidavit filed   by   Principal   Secretary,   Water   Resources   Department State   of  M.P.   and   submitted   that   on  1.2.2017,   one   week time   was   granted     but   till   today   no   compliance   of   order dated 18.7.2016 has been made.

In   reply,   Shri   Rohit   Kumar   Mangal,   learned Government   Advocate   submits   that   the   Committee   is   at final stage and prays for and is granted seven days further time,   subject   to   filing   an   affidavit   of   Pankaj   Agrawal, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department within the aforesaid period.

List the matter on Wednesday i.e. on 15.02.2017.

   
                (P. K. Jaiswal)                          (Virender Singh)
                     Judge                                   Judge

moni/pp