Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Reckitt Benckiser(India) Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Gillette India Ltd. Represented By Its ... on 31 August, 2018

Bench: Rohinton Fali Nariman, Indu Malhotra

                                                      1




     ITEM NO.20                             COURT NO.9                    SECTION XII

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s)            for   Special    Leave    to   Appeal   (C)     No(s).      21640-
     21644/2018

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-04-2018
     in OSA No. 35/2018 19-04-2018 in OSA No. 36/2018 19-04-2018 in OSA
     No. 37/2018 19-04-2018 in OSA No. 38/2018 19-04-2018 in OSA No.
     39/2018 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras)

     RECKITT BENCKISER(INDIA) PVT. LTD.                                   Petitioner(s)

                                                     VERSUS

     GILLETTE INDIA LTD.                                                  Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.111897/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.117596/2018-PERMISSION TO
     FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS)

     Date : 31-08-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
                         HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA


     For Petitioner(s)              Mr.   Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv.
                                    Mr.   Chander Lal, Sr. Adv.
                                    Mr.   R.Jawahar Lal, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Siddharth Bawa, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Shyamal Anand, Adv.
                                    Ms.   Nancy Roy, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Mayank Kshirsagr, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Balaji Srinivasan, AOR

     For Respondent(s)              Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.
                                    Mr. Nikhil Roihatgi, Adv.
                                    Mr. Kapil Arora, Adv.
                                    Mr. Juvraj Singh, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                    Mr. Madhav Khosla, Adv.
                                    Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv.
Digitally signed by
SHASHI SAREEN
Date: 2018.09.01
12:08:10 IST
Reason:                             Mr. Satvik Varma, Adv.
                                    M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Aor, AOR


                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                 2

                             O R D E R

Let a copy of the petitions be served on learned counsel for the respondent.

Status quo, as it exists today, shall be maintained by the parties, in the meantime.

Learned counsel for the respondent is granted two weeks’ time for filing counter affidavit.

Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. List the matter on Wednesday i.e. 03.10.2018.



(SHASHI SAREEN)                          (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY)
   AR CUM PS                                   BRANCH OFFICER