Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Shashidhar Shetty vs Sri.Prajwal on 20 September, 2019

Author: K.N.Phaneendra

Bench: K.N. Phaneendra

                         1


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019

                      BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA

           CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1278/2016

BETWEEN

SRI SHASHIDHAR SHETTY
S/O BABU SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT HOSAMANE
MALAYABETTU
HALEKATTE, KALYA VILLAGE
UDUPI-572 101
                                     ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI K. PRASANNA SHETTY, ADV.)

AND

1.    SRI PRAJWAL S/O K. NAGARAJ
      AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
      R/O DEVIKRIPA HOUSE
      NEAR JUMADI TEMPLE,
      KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE,
      KARKALA TALUK
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

2.    SRI SATHEESHA
      S/O LATE BOGUR POOJARAJU SHETTY,
      AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
      R/O THUKRABETTU HOUSE,
      KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE
                         2


     KARKALA TALUK
     UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

3.   SRI SHASHIKANTHA
     S/O KUMAR MOILI
     AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
     R/O NAGASHREE NIVASA
     KALYA POST
     NITTE VILLAGE
     KARKALA TALUK
     UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

4.   SRI SUSHANTHA S/O SADANANDA
     AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
     R/O DARKASU HOUSE
     KEMMANNU
     NITTE VILLAGE
     KARKALA TALUK
     UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

5.   SRI PAVAN KOTIAN
     S/O SHEENA KOTIAN
     AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
     R/O KEMMANNUK, NITTE VILLAGE,
     KARKALA TLAUK,
     UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

6.   SRI PRADEEPA
     S/O SADASHIVA ACHARYA
     AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
     R/O DARKASU HOUSE
     KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE,
     KARKALA TALUK,
     UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

7.   SRI SUNIL KUMAR
     S/O SADASHIVA POOJARY
                         3


      AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
      R/O OM DURGA NIVASA
      KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE,
      KARKALA TALUK,
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

8.    SRI CHETHAN SUVARNA
      S/O KRISHNA SUVARNA
      AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
      R/O KARUNA NIVASA
      KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE,
      KARKALA TALUK,
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

9.    SRI DEEPAK J MOILI
      S/O JAYA M MOILI
      AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
      R/O SRI DURGA PRASAD HOUSE
      KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE,
      KARKALA TALUK,
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

10.   SRI SHAILESH K SUVARNA
      S/O KRISHNA SUVARNA
      AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
      R/O KRISHNA SUVARNA DHAMA,
      KALYA POST, NITTE VILLAGE,
      KARKALA TALUK,
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

11.   SRI DHANARAJ ACHARYA
      S/O MADHAVA ACHARYA
      AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
      R/O DARKASU HOUSE
      KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE,
      KARKALA TALUK
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101
                         4



12.   SRI PRANAY S/O SUDHAKARA SHETTY
      AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
      R/O THUKRABETTU
      KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE,
      KARKALA TALUK
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

13.   SRI SANTHOSH
      S/O SADANANDA
      AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
      R/O ANTHOTTU HOUSE
      KEMMANNU, NITTE VILLAGE,
      KARKALA TALUK
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

14.   SRI SOORYAKANTHA S/O KUMARA MOILI,
      AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
      R/O NAGASHREE HOUSE
      NITTE VILLAGE,
      KARKAL TALUK
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

15.   SRI DINESH S/O DEJAPPA
      AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
      R/O KELAGINA POLLADKA HOUSE
      KALYA POST,
      NITTE VILLAGE
      KARKALA TALUK
      UDUPI DISTRICT-572 101

16. STATE BY P.S.I.,
    RURAL P.S., KARKALA,
    REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT
    BENGALURU-560 001
                               ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K. CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADV., FOR R1-R15;
                            5


SRI ROHITH B.J., HCGP, FOR R16)

     THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 372
CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED 28.04.2016 IN
C.C.NO.329/2013 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, KARKALA AND CONVICT THE
ACCUSED PERSONS/RESPONDENTS HEREIN, FOR
THE OFFENCES P/U/SS.143, 147, 148, 447, 323, 504
56 R/W 149 OF IPC.
     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

                   JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the matter has been settled between the parties out of the Court. Hence, the appellant would like to withdraw the appeal.

2. The memo is placed on record.

3. In view of the memo filed, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE SBS*