Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Manisha Agarwal vs Lavaish Mohan Agarwal on 14 December, 2015

Bench: Dipak Misra, Prafulla C. Pant

     ITEM NO.62                              COURT NO.4                   SECTION XVIA

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F         I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                              Transfer Petition(s)(Civil)     No(s).    1248/2015

     MANISHA AGARWAL                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     LAVAISH MOHAN AGARWAL                                                 Respondent(s)


     (with appln. (s) for stay and office report)

     WITH
     T.P.(C) No. 1255/2015
     (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report)


     Date : 14/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT

     For Petitioner(s)                 Ms. Mahima Gupta, AOR
                                       Mr. Anish Chawala, Adv.


     For Respondent(s)                 Mr. Vishal Arun, AOR


                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

In terms of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondent, let the matter be listed after four weeks.

(Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Gulshan Kumar Arora Date: 2015.12.14 17:30:41 IST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1248 OF 2015 Manisha Agarwal … Petitioner VERSUS Lavaish Mohan Agarwal … Respondent O R D E R Heard Mr. R. Anand Padmanabhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Despite service, none appeared for the respondent.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed that the Matrimonial Suit No. 119/2015 of titled as Sudipta Roy Chowdhary vs. Navnita Roy Chowdhary pending before Additional District Judge, Chandernagore, District Hoogly, West Bangal be transferred to the District Judge, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand.

The learned District Judge, Jamshedpur shall assign the matter to the appropriate court for its disposal. Let the records of the case be transferred without delay.

The transfer petition is accordingly allowed.

................,J.

(Dipak Misra) ................,J.

(Prafulla C. Pant) New Delhi;

December 14, 2015