Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Bombay High Court

Srt Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd vs Nesco Limited (Now Stander Engineering ... on 7 October, 2019

Author: A.K. Menon

Bench: A.K. Menon

                                                                           12-NMCD-1824-19.doc


Dixit


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                               ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1824 OF 2019
                                                IN
                                  COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.935 OF 2019
        SRT Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai                        ....Applicant
                 In the matter between
        SRT Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai                        ....Plaintiff
                        V/s.
        Nesco Ltd. (Now Stander Engineering Co. Ltd.),
        Mumbai and Ors.                                                  ....Defendants


        Mr. Yashodhan Deshmukh, i/by Mr. Yatin Shah, for the Applicant-Original
        Plaintiff.

        Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud, with Mrs. Leena Shah, i/by Shah and Furia
        Associates, for Defendant No.1.

        Mr. A.R. Shaikh for Defendant No.2.


                                                          CORAM : A.K. MENON, J.

DATED : 7TH OCTOBER, 2019.

P.C. :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Mr. Deshmukh states that in paragraph 13 of the written statement of defendant no.3, dated 30 th August 2019, a clear statement has been made that defendant no.3 is not in the business of manufacturing the equipment referred to in paragraph 2 of the plaint.
1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 08/10/2019 02:17:42 :::

12-NMCD-1824-19.doc

3. In that view of the matter, there is no need to grant any ad-interim relief. In the event, defendant no.3 is found to be violating his statement, liberty to apply.

4. Rejoinder, if any, to be filed within one week from today.

(A.K. MENON, J.) 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 07/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 08/10/2019 02:17:42 :::