Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Kerala High Court

Thekkekarakayil Abdul Nazer vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 31 March, 2005

       

  

  

 
 
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM

       TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014/17TH POUSHA, 1935

                     WP(C).No. 6548 of 2013 (P)
                     ---------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
--------------

       THEKKEKARAKAYIL ABDUL NAZER,
       S/O.LATE CHEKU, MANNINGALYIL HOUSE, MARACNHERY AMSOM
       PARICHAKAAM DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
       PIN 679581 REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
       ABDUL GHAYYUM
       S/O.ALI, AGED 30, AZHIKKALAYIL HOUSE
       MARACNHERY AMSOM, PARICHAKAM DESOM, PONNANI TALUK
       MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 679581.

       BY ADVS.SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN
                        SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH
                        SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA



RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

          1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
       REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VYDHYUDHIBHAVANAM
       PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004.

          2. THE SPECIAL OFFICER (REVENUE)
       KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHYUDHIBHAVAN
       PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004.

          3. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER
       KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE
       ERNAKULAM-682031.

          4. M/S.RASHTRA DEEPIKA LTD
       OPP NORTH RAILWAY STATION, RAILWAY STATION ROAD
       ERNAKULAM, PIN 682018
       REPRESENTED BY ITS RESIDENT MANAGER.

       R1 TO 3  BY ADV. SMT.P.K.RADHIKA-KSEB
       R4  BY ADVS. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER
                    SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN
       R BY SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB


       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD  ON
07-01-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 6548 of 2013 (P)




                             APPENDIX



PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS


EXT.P1     COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY 10.12.2008

EXT.P2     COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.4992/2005 DATED 31.03.2005 OF
           SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, EDAPPALLY

EXT.P3     COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 16.05.2012

EXT.P4     COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 9.03.2006

EXT.P5     COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER DATED 10.05.2006

EXT.P6     COPY OF THE B.O(FM) NO. HTB/10/1056/PENALTY/2006/1156
           DATED 12.02.2007

EXT.P7     COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE RS.1,35,65,533/- DATED
           22.06.2007

EXT.P8     COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BEARING NO.AE/HT-GNL/RASHTRA
           DEEPIKA/12-13/3445 DATED 12.10.2012

EXT.P9     COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 6.12.2011




RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS


EXT.R1(A)  COPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE DETAILS OF ARREARS IN
           RESPECT OF M/S.RASHTRA DEEPIKA LTD.




                                                         /TRUE COPY/



                                                      P. A. TO JUDGE



Pn



                   C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.
               ------------------------------------
               W.P.(C). No. 6548 of 2013
        ---------------------------------------------------
       Dated this the 7th day of January, 2014


                          JUDGMENT

Issue involved in this writ petition is closely related to the subject matter of WP(C) No. 6340/2008 which was disposed of by this court on today, vide separate judgment. The petitioner herein is the purchaser of the property along with the building wherein the electric connection in question is provided. By virtue of judgment in WP(C) No. 6340/2008 the order imposing penalty against the earlier owner of the building was set aside and direction was issued to revise the computation of penalty.

2. In this writ petition the petitioner is seeking declaration to the effect that he is not liable to pay the amount of penalty assessed against the previous owner as well as the arrears of electricity charges with respect to the period prior to transfer of the property. The petitioner is also challenging Ext.P8 through which W.P.(C). No. 6548 of 2013 -2- transfer of electric connection into his name was declined on the basis that the penalty proceedings is pending in challenge before this court in WP(C) No. 6340/2008 and also on the ground that there is arrears due from the previous owner.

3. It is evident that the very same electric connection is continuing in the building which is purchased by the petitioner. Therefore the petitioner is liable to be proceeded with coercive steps of disconnection in case the arrears is defaulted payment. However, in view of the judgment in WP(C) No. 6340/2008 there is every possibility of liability of penalty being reduced to a considerable extent. Dispute between the petitioner herein and the petitioner in WP(C) No. 6340/2008 with respect to the liability for payment of amount of penalty if any reassessed, cannot be adjudicated in this writ petition.

4. Rejection of request of the petitioner for transfer of electric connection on the basis of pendency of WP(C) No.6340/2008 does not survive in view of disposal of the W.P.(C). No. 6548 of 2013 -3- said case. Once the penalty is revised and the arrears is paid either by the petitioner in WP(C) No. 6340/2008 or by the petitioner herein, the application for transfer has to be considered and disposed of on merits.

5. Reserving liberty of the petitioner to approach the concerned authority seeking such relief, this writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE /true copy/ P. A. to Judge Pn