Chattisgarh High Court
Vishnu Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh 14 Fa/180/2003 ... on 17 September, 2018
Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra
Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 2543 of 2018
Vishnu Kumar S/o Sitaram Aged About 43 Years R/o Taparda
Cottage Baikunthpur, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.,
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary , Department Of
Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, District
Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Collector District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) And Land Acquisition Officer
Raigarh District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
4. Sub Divisional Officer (Irrigation) Belpali Pariyojna Minor Project
Raigarh District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For Petitioner Mr. Krishna Gopal Yadav, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. AS Kachhwaha, Additional Advocate General Order On Board By Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 17/9/2018
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's land has been acquired for Belpali Canal Project by the Water Resources Department in the year 2012. However, while calculating the amount of compensation, the solatium has not been paid to the petitioner. 2
3. If the petitioner feels dissatisfied with the adequacy of the amount of compensation offered to him, the appropriate course is to move an application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
4. The petitioner may move such application, which shall be considered by the competent authority in accordance with law.
5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna