Calcutta High Court
Paresh Nath Pal vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 18 March, 2014
Author: Sambuddha Chakrabarti
Bench: Sambuddha Chakrabarti
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Original Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Dr. Sambuddha Chakrabarti
March 18, 2014
WP 1132 of 2013
Paresh Nath Pal
Vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr.S.S. Arefin, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.Raghu Nath Chakraborty, Advocate for the University
Mrs. Debjani Roy, Advocate for the State
The Court :- The respondent no.4 i.e. the Controller of Examinations, University of
Burdwan is directed to affirm an affidavit stating the sequence and the order in which the examiner or the reviewer marked the answer script of the candidate appearing at the B.Sc. Part-II (Hons.) Examination, 2012, in Mathematics (H), Paper-III, bearing Roll 10 SH/124, No. 0002, Registration No.022595 of 2009-2010. He shall indicate how many times the answer script was reviewed, if answer script is reviewed more than once whether that was as per the relevant Regulations of Examinations of the University, if not what was the occasion for re-examining the answer script twice. The Controller of Examinations is further directed to clarify the total marks which were originally awarded to the student in the answer script, . the marks shown in the result and the actual marks he had obtained. He still will have to explain if the actual marks that were awarded to him by the reviewer had been reflected in the result published whether the petitioner would have secured an outright admission to the concerned M.Sc. course.
2
He is further directed to specify in the said affidavit why different marks were given to the petitioner in reply to the query made under the Right to Information Act.
The affidavit shall also specifically indicate whether there was any review or re- examination of the answer script after the University had given reply to the application under the Right to Information Act to the petitioner.
Let the original answer scripts produced in Court be kept in the envelope. Let such affidavit be filed in Court by two weeks.
Matter to appear after two weeks.
(Dr. Sambuddha Chakrabarti, J.) ANC.