Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Avinash Gopichand Chavan vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 September, 2023

Author: M. S. Karnik

Bench: M. S. Karnik

2023:BHC-AS:28268



                    Diksha Rane                                      10 BA 1458-2023.doc




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                BAIL APPLICATION NO.1458/2023

                    AVINASH GOPICHAND CHAVAN                  ..APPLICANT
                          VS.
                    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA                  ..RESPONDENT
                                               ------------
                    Adv. Shailesh Kharat for the applicant.
                    Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.
                    Adv. Trupti Khamkar for the respondent no.2.
                                               ------------

                                          CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

                                          DATE     : SEPTEMBER 26, 2023.
                    P.C. :

                    1.    Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP

                    for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no.2.

                    2.    This is an application for bail in respect of the offence

                    punishable under Sections 363, 376, 376(2)(n) of the Indian

                    Penal Code (hereafter 'IPC' for short) read with Section 4, 8

                    and 12 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,

                    2012 (hereafter 'the POCSO Act' for short) registered on

                    28/11/2021 vide C.R. No.645/2021 with Dehu Road Police

                    Station, Pune.

                    3.    The victim at the relevant time when she left the



                                                                                      1/5
 Diksha Rane                                          10 BA 1458-2023.doc


house on 27/11/2021 along with the applicant was 15 years

old. The applicant is 22 years of age. The victim left the

house without informing anyone. The First Information

Report (FIR) came to be registered on 28/11/2021 by the

mother of the victim. Almost a year later on 10/11/2022, the

police traced the victim. In the statement of the victim

recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, the victim has stated that she had gone with the

applicant on her own freewill. It is further stated by the

victim that she does not have any grievance against the

applicant. However, it is stated that presently she wants to

reside with her parents. The victim further stated that

during the period she was staying with the applicant, the

applicant   was   assaulting   her.   The   victim     suffered        a

miscarriage.

4.   Learned APP and learned counsel for the respondent

no.2 opposed the application for bail. It is further stated that

looking at the conduct of the applicant, the victim does not

feel safe by his presence.

5.   Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the

applicant and the victim as a result of the love affair


                                                                      2/5
 Diksha Rane                                       10 BA 1458-2023.doc


decided to marry and in fact stayed together for one year. It

is further submitted that the romantic relationship between

the couple should not be criminalized.

6.   The    applicant   was   arrested   on   9/11/2022.        The

applicant is 22 years of age. Looking at the age of the

victim, the consent of the victim is immaterial as the

provisions of the POCSO Act are invoked. In the facts and

circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the

applicant on bail as further custody of the applicant will only

be by way of pre-trial punishment. The applicant will

undoubtedly face the consequences post trial if the charges

against him are proved. It is, however, necessary to

safeguard the interest of the complainant and the victim

considering the apprehension expressed.

7.   The applicant is in custody for more than ten months

with no possibility of the trial concluding any time soon. The

investigation is complete. The charge-sheet has been filed.

There are no criminal antecedents reported against the

applicant. In my opinion, the applicant does not appear to

be a flight risk. Hence, the following order :-




                                                                   3/5
 Diksha Rane                                       10 BA 1458-2023.doc


                              ORDER
(a)    The application is allowed.


(b)    The   applicant-   Avinash    Gopichand     Chavan          in

connection with C.R. No.645/2021 with Dehu Road Police Station, Pune, shall be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount.

(c) The applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail surety in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- for a period of 6 weeks in lieu of surety.

(d) The applicant shall attend the Investigating Officer of Chaturshringi police station, Pune, once in a month every first Monday of the month between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m.

(e) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer. The applicant shall not tamper with evidence.

(f) On being released on bail, the applicant shall furnish his contact number and residential address to the Investigating Officer and shall keep him updated, in case there is any change.

4/5
                                Diksha Rane                                         10 BA 1458-2023.doc


                               (g)    Except for attending the trial and for the purpose of

reporting to the Investigating Officer, the applicant shall not enter the Maval Taluka and Pimpri-Chinchwad area, after being released on bail, till the trial concludes.

(h) The applicant shall attend the trial regularly.

8. The application is disposed of.

9. I express my gratitude for the able assistance rendered by the advocate- Ms. Trupti Khamkar representing the respondent no.2. The Legal Services Authorities may pay her the fees as prescribed.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) 5/5 Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 26/09/2023 19:58:18