Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Chattisgarh High Court

State Of Chhattisgarh vs D.R.Gurupanch 13 Mcc/571/2019 ... on 21 August, 2019

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra, Parth Prateem Sahu

                               1
                                                MCC No. 502 of 2019

                                                            NAFR

      HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                      MCC No. 502 of 2019

    State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Public Health
     Engineering Department (Wrongly Typed As Social Welfare
     Department)     Government     of   Chhattisgarh,   Mahanadi
     Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

                                                    ---- Applicant

                             Versus

  1. D.R. Gurupanch S/o Late Agar Chand Gurupanch Aged
     About 59 Years Occupation Service, The Then Assistant
     Engineer, Public Health Engineering, Sub Division Kasdol,
     District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. (Pettioner).

  2. Chhattisgarh Election Commision Through The Chief
     Election Commissioner, Chhattisgarh, D. K.S. Bhawan, Old
     Mantralaya Road, Tahsil and District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

                                               ---- Respondents



For Applicant           :-   Shri R.S. Baghel, Dy. A.G.
For Respondent No.2     :-   Shri Ranbir Singh Marhas, Advocate


              Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra
              Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, JJ.

Order on Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J 21/08/2019

1. Heard.

2

MCC No. 502 of 2019

2. By order under review passed in writ appeal we had only allowed the respondent to continue to work at his pre- transfer posting at Kasdol till Code of Conduct for Parliamentary Election is operative.

3. Admittedly, the said Code of Conduct is already over, therefore, the prayer made for recalling the order has itself become infructuous or redundant.

4. The MCC is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the State to implement the order passed by this Court in writ appeal.

                    Sd/-                           Sd/-
         (Prashant Kumar Mishra)           (Parth Prateem Sahu)
                  Judge                            Judge
Ankit