Section 30 in Tamil Nadu Minor Inams (Abolition and Conversion Into Ryotwari) Act, 1963
30. Appeals.
(1)Against any decision of the Tribunal under sub-section (3) of section 11, the Government may, within six months from the date of the decision, and any person aggrieved by any decision of the Tribunal under sub-section (3) of section 11, section 26, section 27, section 28, or section 29 may, within three months from the date of the decision, appeal to the Special Appellate Tribunal consisting of two Judges of the High Court nominated, from time to time, by the Chief Justice in this behalf:Provided that the Special Appellate Tribunal may, in its discretion, allow further time not exceeding three months for the filing of such appeal.(2)The members of the Special Appellate Tribunal shall hear the appeal on all points, whether of law or of fact. Where on any such point or points the members are divided in their opinion, they shall state the point or points on which they are so divided and such point or points together with their opinion thereon shall then be laid before one or more Judges nominated for the purpose by the Chief Justice and such Judge or Judges shall hear the appeal in so far as it relates to such point or points and on each such point, the decision of the majority of the Judges who have heard the appeal including those who first heard it shall be deemed to be the decision of the Special Appellate Tribunal.(3)[The Special Appellate Tribunal shall, subject to the provisions of section 47-A] [Inserted by section 3(3) of the Tamil Nadu Inam Estates and Minor Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Amendment Act, 1975 (Tamil Nadu Act 22 of 1975).], have the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Central Act V of 1908), when hearing an appeal.(4)Every decision of the Special Appellate Tribunal, and subject to such decision, every decision of the Tribunal, shall be binding on all persons claiming an interest in any inam land notwithstanding that any such person has not preferred any application or filed any statement or adduced any evidence or appeared or participated in any proceeding before the Tribunal or the Special Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be.
