Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Ganeshbhai Ramabhai Prajapati & 2 vs State Of Gujarat & on 3 April, 2017

Author: J.B.Pardiwala

Bench: J.B.Pardiwala

                    R/CR.MA/8497/2017                                                 ORDER




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE
                                    FIR/ORDER) NO. 8497 of 2017

         ==========================================================
                    GANESHBHAI RAMABHAI PRAJAPATI & 2....Applicant(s)
                                       Versus
                         STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR SUNIL S JOSHI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 - 3
         MR NATVAR D BHARWAD, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
         MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
          
                                         Date : 03/04/2017 
                                           ORAL ORDER

1. Rule   returnable   forthwith.   Ms.   Pathak,   the   learned   APP   waives  service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1­ State  of Gujarat. Mr. Natvar Bharwad, the learned advocate waives service of  notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.2­ original first  informant.

2. By   this   application   under   Section   482   of   the   Code   of   Criminal  Procedure, 1973, the applicants­original accused persons seek to invoke  the inherent powers of this Court praying for quashing of the F.I.R. being  C.R.No.I­60   of   2016   filed   before   the   Bopal   Police   Station,   District­  Ahmedabad (Rural), for the offence punishable under Sections­406, 420  r/w.114 of the I.P.C. 

3. Today   when   the   matter   is   taken   up   for   hearing,   it   is   jointly  Page 1 of 3 HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Tue Aug 15 16:38:33 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/8497/2017 ORDER submitted   by  the  learned  advocates   appearing  for   the   parties  that   an  amicable   settlement   has   taken   place   and   the   quashing   of   the   FIR   is  prayed   for   with   the   consent   of   the   respondent   No.2  viz.Rameshbhai  Khodabhai Bharwad. He has also filed an affidavit, confirming about the  settlement. The affidavit reads thus:­ I,   Rameshbhai   Khodabhai   Bharwad,   respondent   No.2   herein,   do   hereby on solemn affirm and oath on affirmation submit as under:­

1.  The contents of the captioned application are read over to me and   explained  in vernacular  and  as I am the  first  informant  of the  FIR   dated 15.7.2016 being I CR No.60/2016 registered with Bopal Police   Station for the offences under Sections 406420 and 114 of IPC, I am   conversant   with   the   subject   matter   of  the   application   and   therefore   competent to affirm the present Affidavit­in­Reply.

2.  I state that I had lodged the aforesaid FIR, interalia, alleging that   accused  No.1 had executed  an agreement  to sell dated 3.6.2014  for   selling his part of the land in dispute in my favour for a consideration   of Rs.25 lakh and an amount of Rs.21 lakh was paid by me by way of   part   payment   pursuant   to   the   said   agreement.   In   spire   of   having   executed such agreement to sell, accused No.1, disowned the same and   attempted to sell the said land in favour of the others. Some exchange   of public notices took place between me and accused No.1 through the   lawyers of respective parties and ultimately, accused No.1 executed a   registered sale deed dated 6.6.2016 in favour of accused No.2 to 4 in   breach of the said agreement to sell. I had therefore filed Regular Civil   Suit No.138/2015 before the Civil Court, Sanad against accused No.1   and other co­owners of the said land, but the plaint of the said suit   was   rejected   by   the   Hon'ble   Court   by   an   order   dated   7.4.2016.   Thereafter, another suit being Special Civil Suit No.230/2016 came to   be filed  by me  praying  for the relief of specific  performance  against   accused No.1 and other co­owners and for the cancellation of the sale   deed executed in favour of accused Nos.2 to 4. The said suit was filed   before the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge (Rural) at Ahmedabad.  

3.   In the course of hearing of the said suit, I as well as the accused   persons   have   entered   a   compromise   and   pursuant   to   the   same   by   executing   a   cancellation   deed   dated   20.3.2017,   I   have   voluntarily   cancelled the agreement to sell dated 3.6.2014 executed in my favour   by accused No.1 in respect of the disputed land. I have also withdrawn   Special Civil Suit No.230/2016 unconditionally by withdrawal purshis   dated 20.3.2017. I stand by and confirm the contents of withdrawal   purshis as well as the cancellation deed dated 20.3.2017 executed by   Page 2 of 3 HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Tue Aug 15 16:38:33 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/8497/2017 ORDER me cancelling agreement to sell dated 3.6.2014. I further stand by and   confirm the fact that I have received back the amount of consideration   paid   by   me   to   accused   No.1   under   the   agreement   to   sell   dated   3.6.2014 and that I admit and confirm the sale deed dated 6.62016   executed  by accused  No.1  and  other  co­owners  in favour  of accused   Nos.2 to 4 and I further admit and confirm that by virtue of the said  sale deed, the disputed land is owned and possessed by accused Nos.2   to 4 exclusively and that I have got no right, title or interest in the   disputed land.

4. In view of the compromise entered by me with accused No.1 and   other co­owners of the said land, I do not want to further pursue the   FIR in question and I have no objection if the captioned application is   allowed and the FIR dated 15.7.2016 lodged by me and investigation   done pursuant to the same is quashed and set aside.

What   is   stated   hereinabove   is   true   to   the   best   of   my   knowledge,   information and belief and I believe the same to be true. 

Solemnly affirmed at Ahmedabad on this 3rd day of April, 2017."

4. Taking into consideration the nature of the dispute and the fact  that   the   parties   have   amicably   settled   the   dispute,   no   useful   purpose  would   now   be   served   to   allow   the   police   to   continue   with   the  investigation.   The   affidavit   filed   by   the   respondent   no.2­original   first  informant is ordered to be taken on record.

5. In the result, this application is allowed. The F.I.R. being C.R.No.I­ 60 of 2016 filed before the Bopal Police Station, District­ Ahmedabad  (Rural), is hereby ordered to be quashed qua the present applicants. All  consequential proceedings pursuant thereto shall stand terminated.   

Rule is made absolute.  Direct service is permitted.

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.)  aruna Page 3 of 3 HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Tue Aug 15 16:38:33 IST 2017