Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 6]

Madras High Court

M/S. Sri Aiswarya Rock Export vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 August, 2021

Author: R.Suresh Kumar

Bench: R.Suresh Kumar

                                                                       W.P.(MD)Nos.10 & 11 of 2012

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 12.08.2021

                                                   CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR


                                       W.P.(MD)Nos.10 & 11 of 2012
                                                        and
                                        M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 1 of 2012


                     M/s. Sri Aiswarya Rock Export,
                     Rep. by its Partner,
                     P.K.M. Selvam,
                     SF.No.267/2, Near Veerakaliamman Kovil,
                     Keelavalavu,
                     Melur Taluk,
                     Madurai District – 625 102.          : Petitioner in both Writ Petitions


                                                        Vs.


                     1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                        Represented by the Secretary,
                        Commercial Taxes &
                        Religious Endowments Department,
                        Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.


                     2.The Commercial Tax Officer,
                        Melur Assessment Circle,
                        Melur, Madurai District.



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/6
                                                                               W.P.(MD)Nos.10 & 11 of 2012



                     3.The Regional Transport Officer,
                        Madurai North,
                        Madurai.                             : Respondents in both Writ Petitions



                     COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the

                     Constitution of India for issuance of Writs of Declaration, to declare

                     the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles

                     into Local Areas Act, 1990, as unconstitutional, ultra vires Articles

                     14, 19 (1) (g), 301 and 304 (a) and (b) of the Constitution of India

                     and being unenforceable and of no effect in so far as the petitioner

                     is concerned.

                                        For Petitioner     : Mr.V.Veerapandian
                                                            for Mr.Sribalaji
                                        For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar
                                                            Government Advocate
                                                            [In both Writ Petitions]


                                                    COMMON ORDER

********************* The prayer sought for in these writ petitions is for Writs of Declaration, to declare the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990, as unconstitutional, ultra vires Articles 14, 19 (1) (g), 301 and 304 (a) and (b) of the Constitution of India and being unenforceable and of no effect in so far as the petitioner is concerned. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 2/6 W.P.(MD)Nos.10 & 11 of 2012

2.When the case is taken up for hearing, Mr.V.Veerapandian, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that, the issue raised in these writ petitions had already been raised in a batch of cases and ultimately, the matter has gone to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The issue has been settled in State of Kerala and others Vs. Fr.William Fernandez etc., reported in 2017 SCC online SC 1291. Following the same, number of writ petitions similar to that of the present writ petitions have been dismissed at various dates and one such order in this regard had been passed by the learned Judge of this Court in W.P.(MD)Nos.7144 to 7149 of 2008 etc., batch in the matter of M/s.PRP Exports Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu reported in 2020-2-Writ L.R. 815, and the same has been placed before this Court and relying upon the same, learned Counsel submits that similar order can be passed in these writ petitions also.

3.The said position has not been controverted. Hence, the learned Government Advocate also seeks dismissal of these writ petitions, following the earlier order.

4.I have considered the submissions made by the learned Counsels on either side and I have perused the materials placed before this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 3/6 W.P.(MD)Nos.10 & 11 of 2012

5.In the said order dated 03.11.2020, the learned Judge has passed the following order:

“These writ petitions are filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents their men, agents, subordinates from levying and collecting Entry Tax under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 from the petitioner for registering their respective vehicles as per the respective invoices mentioned in the petition.
2.The goods/vehicles, which are the subject matter of these Writ Petitions, were imported by the respective petitioners from abroad. According to the respective petitioners, the levy of entry tax on the said goods/vehicles under the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicle into Local Areas Act 1990, is ultravires to the Constitution of India and is null and void and therefore, the consequential demand is also null and void.
3.The issues raised in these Writ Petitions have been considered by the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of State of Kerala and others vs Fr.William Fernandez etc., reported in 2017 SCC Online SC 1291, and the Honourable Supreme Court had upheld the levy of entry tax on goods imported from any place outside the territories of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 4/6 W.P.(MD)Nos.10 & 11 of 2012 India into a local area for consumption, use or sale.
4.This Court, in a batch of Writ Petitions involving the same issue, also followed the aforesaid decision of Honourable Supreme Court and dismissed the Writ Petitions on 01.03.2019 filed by similarly placed petitioners in W.P. (MD)No.4837 of 2006 batch. Therefore, these Writ Petitions will also have to be necessarily dismissed. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed. However, there is no order as to costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.”

6.Since the issue raised in those writ petitions is similar to that of the present writ petitions, these writ petitions should also face the same fate and accordingly, they have to be dismissed and hence, these writ petitions are dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.





                                                                             12.08.2021
                     Index         : Yes / No
                     Internet: Yes / No
                     MR


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 5/6 W.P.(MD)Nos.10 & 11 of 2012 R.SURESH KUMAR., J.

MR Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To

1.The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Commercial Taxes & Religious Endowments Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.

2.The Commercial Tax Officer, Melur Assessment Circle, Melur, Madurai District.

3.The Regional Transport Officer, Madurai North, Madurai.

COMMON ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD)Nos.10 & 11 of 2012 12.08.2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 6/6