Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Samata Bala Sarkar vs Mridul Hazarika And Anr on 3 June, 2019

Author: Manash Ranjan Pathak

Bench: Manash Ranjan Pathak

                                                                            Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010077692019




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                               Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 207/2019

            1:SAMATA BALA SARKAR
            W/O. SRI UMESH CHANDRA ROY, R/O. NOKHOLA GRANT, P.S. JAGIROAD,
            DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM-782410.

            VERSUS

            1:MRIDUL HAZARIKA AND ANR.
            VICE CHANCELLOR, GUWAHATI UNIVERSITY, P.O. GUWAHATI
            UNIVERSITY, PIN-781014.

            2:DHRUBAJYOTI CHOUDHURY
             CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS
             GAUHATI UNIVERSITY
             P.O. GUWAHATI UNIVERSITY
             PIN-781014

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. D C C PHUKAN

Advocate for the Respondent : MS. P BARMAN (SC, G.U.)




                                          BEFORE
                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

                                           ORDER

03-06-2019 Heard Mr. D. C. C. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. P. Barman, learned counsel for the respondent/contemnor Nos. 1 and 2.

Matter relates to willful disobedience of the order of the Court dated 18.04.2018, Page No.# 2/2 passed in WP(C) No.5513/2016.

Learned counsel for the respondents/contemnors has submitted that pursuant to the order dated 18.04.2018, noted above, respondent University re-evaluated the answer scripts of the petitioner's B.Ed. Examination of 2014 (old course) held during August, 2014 in which she appeared with Roll No.1812/2014 and on 15.05.2018 vide No.2581, the said University communicated the re-evaluated marks of her said B.Ed. Examination.

Ms. Barman, learned counsel for the Gauhati University have placed the copy of the relevant note sheet pertaining to re-scrutiny of answer scripts of B.Ed. (old course) held in August, 2014 duly endorsed by the Controller of Examination, Gauhati University on 25.04.2019 as well as the copy of the relevant page of the Issue Register of the Gauhati University, which too is endorsed by the Controller of Examination, Gauhati University on 25.04.2019.

The re-scrutiny of the answer scripts of the petitioners B.Ed. (old course) held in August, 2014 reflects that after such re-evaluation of her answer scripts the petitioner obtained 31 marks in her first paper and 29 marks in her fourth paper.

As the respondents contemnors have already complied with the order dated 18.04.2018, passed in PW(C) No.5513/2016, this Court does not find any willful disobedience on the part of the respondents/contemnors and accordingly, this contempt petition being devoid of merit stands dismissed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant