Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Delhi District Court

Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust vs . State Of Nct Of Delhi. on 24 November, 2012

Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust  Vs.  State of NCT of Delhi. 



IN THE COURT OF SHRI  J.P.S. MALIK :  ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE­04  : 
       SOUTH DISTRICT  :   SAKET COURT COMPLEX, NEW DELHI

                                                                             CS. NO. 343/12 

In the matter of :


           Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust
           Having its office at B­50, 
           Gulmohar Park,
           New Delhi­110049
           Through its Trustees
    1. Sh. Dharam Bhushan Jain
        S/o Sh. Raj Krishan Jain
        R/o H. No. 4239­A, Shakahar Building,
        Sh. Raj Krishan Jain Street,
        1, Ansari Road, Daryagunj, Delhi
    2. Sh. Shiv Kumar Jatia
        S/o Sh. Shubh Karan Jatia
        R/o B­50, Gulmohar Park,
        New Delhi                                                                  .....Plaintiff


                                   Versus

          State of NCT of Delhi
        Through Chief Secretary
        Govt. of NCT Delhi, Delhi Secretariat,
        I.P. Estate, New Delhi­110002                                                ....Defendant




CS. No. 343/12                                                                         Page 1 of 6
 Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust  Vs.  State of NCT of Delhi. 




                                                Order

    1. Trustees   of   Ram   Pyari   Devi   Charitable   Trust,   Head   Office   at   B­50, 

        Gulmohar Park, New Delhi­49 namely Dharam Bhushan Jain and Shiv 

        Kumar Jatia have filed an application seeking leave of the court to file a 

        suit U/s 92 (3) of CPC for amendment of the objects of the charitable 

        trust.



    2. In brief, the facts are, vide Deed of Trust dated 21.07.98 registered with 

        the office of Sub­Registrar, New Delhi on 11.08.98 was executed by Sh. 

        Satish Kumar Jatia. At present, there are five trustees of the trust and it is 

        stated that a resolution dated 01.06.12 had been passed by the Board of 

        Trustees   authorising   Dharam   Bhushan   Jain   to   file   the   application   for 

        and on behalf of the trust. The trust is running a school under the name 

        and style of Delhi Public School situated at New Town, Kolkata. As per 

        the   Object   Clause,   being   Clause   no.   4   of   the   Trust   Deed,   the   trust 

        established   on   21.07.98   was   for   the   purpose   of   carrying   on   various 

        objects like

        a)   for   establishing,   providing   assistance   etc   to   hospitals,   medical 

        colleges, nursing institutions, child home centres, etc.

        b)   to   establish   or   provide   financial   assistance   to   schools,   colleges, 

        libraries, research and other institutions etc.


CS. No. 343/12                                                                          Page 2 of 6
 Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust  Vs.  State of NCT of Delhi. 



        c) to establish, maintain or run scholarship in aid of students.

        d) to promote, establish, support etc, for promotion of science, library, 

        music etc.

        e)   to   provide   financial   assistance   to   schools   colleges,   universities, 

        research and other institutions etc.

        f) to establish or provide assistance to homes for aged, orphanages or 

        other like establishments

        g) to establish and maintain institutions for the physically handicapped, 

        disabled etc.

        h)   to   grant   relief   and   assistance   to   the   needy   victims   during   natural 

        calamities.

        i)   to   construct,   repair   and   manage   marghats,   cemeteries   and   burial 

        grounds, etc

        j) to grant,  aid  or provide assistance  to other public charitable  trust/ 

        societies.



    3. The trust is also registered U/s 12A of Income Tax Act, 1961 wef 25.08.99 

        and as per the conditions for registering the trust U/s 12A of the Income 

        Tax Act, one of the condition being condition no. (vi) is that there shall 

        be no change in the Trust Deed/ Memorandum of Association without 

        the approval of the jurisdictional High Court/  appropriate authority and 

        in view of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Andhra 


CS. No. 343/12                                                                           Page 3 of 6
 Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust  Vs.  State of NCT of Delhi. 



        Chamber of Commerce, the trust was obliged to continue to serve the 

        main object of the trust in future without any change.



    4. The trust applied for notification U/s 10 (23c) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 

        1961,   permissible   to   any   university   or   other   educational   institutions 

        existing solely for educational purposes, which could be approved by the 

        appropriate authority.



    5. The trust passed a resolution in the board of trustees on 01.06.12 and 

        decided that there should be a change in the Object Clause of the Deed 

        of   Trust,   and   by   way   of   change,   the   object   of   the   trust   were   to   be 

        restricted only for the purpose of establishing, developing and providing 

        assistance   for   education,   scholarships,   promotion   of   science,   library, 

        music   etc   deleting   the   purposes   other   than   those   related   to   the 

        educational activities.



    6. Instead   of   approaching   the   jurisdictional   High   Court   for   effecting   a 

        change   in   the   Trust   Deed/   Memorandum   of   Association   as   per 

        conditions no. VI prescribed at the time of registration of the Trust with 

        the Income Tax Department U/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the 

        applicants have approached this court U/s 92 (3) of the Code of Civil 

        Procedure which reads as under:


CS. No. 343/12                                                                             Page 4 of 6
 Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust  Vs.  State of NCT of Delhi. 



                    92.   Public Charities:­         

                     (1)..................................................................................

                    .........................................................................................

(2) .................................................................................... (3) The Court may alter the original purposes of an express or constructive trust created for public purposes of a charitable or religious nature and allow the property or income of such trust or any portion thereof to be applied cy pres in one or more of the following circumstances, namely:­

(a) where the original purposes of the trust, in whole or in part,­

(i) have been, as far as may be, fulfilled; or

(ii) cannot be carried out at all, or cannot be carried out according to the directions given in the instrument creating the trust or, where there is no such instrument, according to the spirit of the trust; or

(b) ...................................................................................

(c) .................................................................................... As per section 92 (1) CPC, the suit for the purpose can be filed by the Advocate General or two or more persons having an interest in the trust CS. No. 343/12 Page 5 of 6 Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust Vs. State of NCT of Delhi.

and having obtained the leave of the court to institute a suit in Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction.

7. Arguments were heard on behalf of the applicants as regards the permission to be granted to them to institute a suit for the purpose U/s 92 (3) of CPC. The suit for the purpose is to be instituted and court may alter the original purposes of a trust in certain situations. Situation no. (1) Where the original purpose of the trust have been fulfilled or (2) Where the original purpose of the trust cannot be carried out. In the present case, neither of the two condition is fulfilled, justifying any change in the original purpose of the trust and the application has been filed only because the trustees are facing difficulties in getting the trust notified U/s 10 (23c) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, permissible t o any university or other educational institutions. As per the condition (vi) of Registration of the Trust U/s 12A of the Income Tax Act dated 25.08.99, approval should have been sought from jurisdictional High Court/ appropriate authority and it should have continued to serve the main object of the trust till that time in view of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Andhra Chamber of Commerce. Trustees of the trust cannot be permitted to circumvent the same by taking recourse to the provisions of section 92(3) CPC. Applicants are not given any leave to institute a suit U/s 92(3) CPC for effecting a change / amendment in CS. No. 343/12 Page 6 of 6 Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust Vs. State of NCT of Delhi.

the object of the charitable trust. The application filed for the purpose is accordingly dismissed and applicants are refused leave to institute a suit U/s 92(3) CPC.

Announced in the open Court                                                  (J.P.S. MALIK)
on 24.11.2012                                                   ADJ­04  : SOUTH DISTRICT
All pages signed                                                        NEW DELHI 




CS. No. 343/12                                                                          Page 7 of 6

Ram Pyari Devi Charitable Trust Vs. State of NCT of Delhi.





CS. No.  343/12

24.11.2012


Present:          None. 

Vide separate order of the date, the applicants are refused leave to institute a suit U/s 92(3) CPC and the application is dismissed.

File be consigned to record room.

(J.P.S. MALIK) ADJ­04 : SOUTH DISTRICT NEW DELHI : 24.11.2012 CS. No. 343/12 Page 8 of 6